- 301
- 10
- Joined
- Jun 24, 2004
loved the 17s
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Originally Posted by AirThompson
Originally Posted by dankenstien88
The simple answer is they both cost ALOT more to manufacture than older models with less technology.
Yea with the straps, clovers, magnets, etc. I hate to say it, but when they do decide to release the XVI, XVII, & XVIII's they're going to have an XI pricetag.
Originally Posted by freakydestroyer
My two favorite J's. But if the quality is going to suck, I'd rather they not come out again. Do it right or don't do it at all.
If you're talking about theseOriginally Posted by bence23
17 lows please.. well both.
they can come out with bs 17 6 rings but not the real shoe . smh
Originally Posted by Al Bundy5
Anybody else think one of the reasons is it will remind everyone of jordan's stint with wizards and harm their marketing of him being the most dominant player ever?
He put up decent numbers, but they weren't MJ numbers. You could tell the magic was gone by then
I remember that dunk clear as day. I really don't know what to make of them not retroing the XVI or XVII since they did retro the XV in 2 colorways. Maybe RockDeep/NikeDealer can shed some more light on this matter. He said some might NEVER be retroed, and to be honest I could see XIX-XX2 never coming back out sans a gimmick pack or package. The black/red XVI was an instant sellout and the white/blue colorway sold well as well. I do remember the cherrywoods and gingers going on sale, but the design was altered, and to say that cherrywood and ginger are unique colorways is being nice. (I do love the cherrywoods though)Originally Posted by dankenstien88
Originally Posted by Al Bundy5
Anybody else think one of the reasons is it will remind everyone of jordan's stint with wizards and harm their marketing of him being the most dominant player ever?
He put up decent numbers, but they weren't MJ numbers. You could tell the magic was gone by then
�I never though of it like that, but I think you may have a point.
�MJ probably HATES the XVII; especially the white/black/lightning yellow joints because�they remind him of that�breakaway dunk he missed in the 2002 All-Star Game.��
I remember SLAM magazine even had a "SLAM-UP" centerfold of�that�dunk�������I think its the only�missed dunk to ever be showcased in a magazine�
Originally Posted by muzikfrk75
The royal 10s sold out. I'm still confused over that one.
Originally Posted by Al Bundy5
Everything with a jumpman sells out nowadays. If son on mars sells out, these will shift
Wait, you say this like the 17's didn't retail for $200Originally Posted by AirThompson
Originally Posted by dankenstien88
The simple answer is they both cost ALOT more to manufacture than older models with less technology.
Yea with the straps, clovers, magnets, etc. I hate to say it, but when they do decide to release the XVI, XVII, & XVIII's they're going to have an XI pricetag.
Just because they're on there doesn't mean they are retail. People want shoes for retail prices. Not everyone is trying to spend 3-400 dollars on every shoe they're trying to cop.Originally Posted by NT2488
I don't think they need to.
Besides, there's a ton of OG XVIs and XVIIs on Flight Club, KixClusives, Image, Ebay etc.
Word. Instead punishing jb by not buying, consumers can't stop giving jb money for this crap. This only encourages them to produce more of this crapOriginally Posted by Chris316
Originally Posted by Al Bundy5
Everything with a jumpman sells out nowadays. If son on mars sells out, these will shift
I still can't fathom on how a garbage like those even sell.