- 11,120
- 3,734
When MJ scored 63, did they win that game?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
[font=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]wow i didnt even know about that.....wilt is an all time great physically ahead of his time......now i see how he could get some many rebs just steal the ball off the rim and dunk...point and reb....nice.....when did offensive goal tending go into effect[/font]1) Offensive goal tending was legal.
Originally Posted by Goldmember
When MJ scored 63, did they win that game?
Originally Posted by Futuristic
I'll take David Robinson's 71 over both games. He needed to come through with the scoring title and he did it.
great post!Originally Posted by CP1708
Guys, the 62 thru 3 is nice, but that's a 38 point quarter he would have needed ya know. Come on.
As for the 81, what many may not remember is he could have EASILY been at 88.
He missed 2 free throws, those are easy on a night when you're feelin it, shoulda hit them.
He had a cherry pick all alone down court play, but Odom threw the ball too damn far, it went out of bounds, better pass, easy dunk
He had a basket waived off, one ref called block, other called charge, they went with charge, and the block ref had called an and 1.
That's 7 easy points right there that puts him at 88.
Add in that he sat 6 minutes of the second quarter (before anyone knew what was coming) plus the final minute of the game he came out. Shave that down a couple minutes, give him 3-4 more minutes (no worries about minutes, the Lakers next game wasn't for 5 more nights, Phil could have played Kobe 48 if he thought it was needed) Kobe would have needed a dozen points in 3-4 more minutes to approach 100.
In today's game, from the perimeter.
Kid did 55, in a HALF. Absurd.
But none of us have seen anything in Wilt's game. No one knows how it was, what he did that night, he just went off, plain and simple. I have no idea which was more impressive nor does it matter to me. Grand scheme, 100 is still 100. Period. Not ever going to be topped, Kobe gave one good run at it, still needed a few extra minutes and a couple extra bounces to get close. *shrugs*
And Wilt had like 58 pt game against NY a few days later that season. If I bothered to look I'm sure he had several other 40+ games that season.Originally Posted by MR J 858
Here is the crazy thing and a lot of people forget about Kobe's 81 point game.
The same season he also dropped 62 in 3 quarters against the Mavs
The same Mavs team that went to the Finals that season and he sat out the entire 4th quarter also.
That was the game where I seriously thought Wilt's record was in trouble.
Phil Jackson even asked him if he wanted to be put back in the 4th.
Originally Posted by MR J 858
Here is how stupid the statement of MJ's 63 point game against the Celtics in the playoffs is better than Kobe's 81 point game.
-First off MJ needed overtime in that game just to get 63 points.
-Second the Bulls lost that game and were bounced out of the 1st round that year.
Originally Posted by Futuristic
Furthermore, I'll take Jordan's 69 point, 18 Rebound, 6 Assist, 4 Steal, and 1 Block game over Kobe's game too.
Originally Posted by kash55
I think Kobe's was more difficult when comparing the two, but more points is more points, so Wilt's record is technically the best.
But I always present this fact when talking about these two games, in these two eras.
The basketball of the 1960s was fast pace, up and down, quick possessions.
Wilt's Philadelphia Warriors had 115 FGAs and the New York Knicks had 118 FGAs
In Kobe's 81 point game the Lakers had a total of 88 FGAs while the Toronto Raptors had 76 FGAs
So you can see that the style of play of Wilts era greatly attributed to that unprecedented achievement.
LOL. That logic is pathetic...Originally Posted by S4L3
Comparing a game in which there were no three pointers to Kobe's 81 is ridiculous...
100>81 and it's not even close.
I've never really given the nod to big men in term's of accomplishments because, well they're the biggest guys on the court
Originally Posted by CP1708
Originally Posted by Futuristic
Furthermore, I'll take Jordan's 69 point, 18 Rebound, 6 Assist, 4 Steal, and 1 Block game over Kobe's game too.
If this thread lasts just a bit longer, pretty soon we'll have
Wilt 100 > Jordan 63 > Jordan 69 > Lebron 50+ > MJ 55 > Melo 40 something > Kareem 38 > random guy getting 22 and 4 rebounds > Pau 19 points > someone's 11 points off the bench in the third game of the season > Kobe 81.
All we have to do is wait long enough, it's going to look just like that real soon. Watch.
You really have no clue how impressive that game was from Wilt.Originally Posted by S4L3
Height measures your physical attribute, not your skill level. I'm just saying, if I had Wilt's height and length in that era, 100 would be much easier than Kobe's 81.
And you say this because.... You saw Wilt's game?Originally Posted by LovesIt
Kobe's was more impressive.
Originally Posted by DCAllAmerican
Why compare though? Why compare? Why downplay one situation for the sake of another? Let both of those games rest in peace man.
But it is funny how people downplayed Kobe's 81 when it happened.
"He played the Raptors"
Sad.
But people downplayed Wilt's as well, as if he had any control on the competition level. He can only play vs. the people in front of him.