Would U Rather Be All-NBA Or All-Star?

[shatterkneesinc]

all nba easily

 

[th0mas cr0wn]

didn't Melo make All nba and not ASG one season?

 

[T0INE]

Originally Posted by hellomarco

it's not even a question

Really though.

All NBA no doubt and like others have said the two are rarely inseparable.
  

 

[brandon3000]

All-NBA is cool but allstar weekend

 

[smedroc]

Originally Posted by TH0MAS CR0WN

didn't Melo make All nba and not ASG one season?

yeah i think thats back when KG, TD and Dirk were killing it in the WC.

 

[blazers21ntnp]

Originally Posted by TH0MAS CR0WN

didn't Melo make All nba and not ASG one season?

Carmelo made the third team in '06 & '09 while missing the ASG.

Rod Strickland was second team in '98, and missed the ASG... then said if he was selected to play in the ASG the following season, he'd refuse.

/

 

[xtapolapacetl]

What the hell kind of stupid question is this? If I made a starting 5 out of the worst all-stars in history, they would get owned by the worst starting 5 from all the players that have ever made an all-NBA team.

This sure would be a phenomenal team:

PG: 93-94 B.J. Armstrong
SG: 08-09 Mo Williams
SF: 01-02 Wally Szczerbiak
PF: 99-00 Dale Davis
C: 03-04 Jamaal Magloire

And I'm sure that there might be even worse combination you could make from previous all-stars. Not to mention ridiculous all-star spots that were obviously not worthy like T-Mac and Iverson this year. When you're all-NBA, you KNOW you're good.

 

[bulls90s]

ALL-NBA for sure.

Wait, WALLY and DALE was an ALL-STAR?!?!?!?!? SMH @ me.

 

[bottom74bottom]

Originally Posted by bulls90s

ALL-NBA for sure.

Wait, WALLY and DALE was an ALL-STAR?!?!?!?!? SMH @ me.

Wally was THAT dude in 01

 

[bentetres]

%#+ is this question all about?

Messed up logic by the thread starter. Yeah all-star mentions might outnumber all-nba mentions but usually once you're all-nba then you probably were an all-star for the season.

 

[frankybaby]

Xtapolapacetl wrote:

---

What the hell kind of stupid question is this? If I made a starting 5 out of the worst all-stars in history, they would get owned by the worst starting 5 from all the players that have ever made an all-NBA team.

This sure would be a phenomenal team:

PG: 93-94 B.J. Armstrong
SG: 08-09 Mo Williams
SF: 01-02 Wally Szczerbiak
PF: 99-00 Dale Davis
C: 03-04 Jamaal Magloire

And I'm sure that there might be even worse combination you could make from previous all-stars. Not to mention ridiculous all-star spots that were obviously not worthy like T-Mac and Iverson this year. When you're all-NBA, you KNOW you're good.

 Wally averaged 18 ppg on a Playoff team that year so i guess thats why.  He was aight back then.

But to answer the question the players probably appreciate the All-NBA selections and the media the All-Star games.  All Star games add up.  Bill Russell only won All-NBA first team honors twice.  Granted Wilt may have gotten it a few of those years, but All-Star games really add up.

 

[seven30]

FrankyBaby I Think U Pretty Much Summed Up What I'm Trying To Say With The Russell/Chamberlain Comparison. Basically I'm Saying Your All-Star Appearances Seem to get more Recognition than All NBA Selections That's All.

 

[botz luvz 23z]

Originally Posted by rillo561

All NBA.

 

[westcoastsfinest]

NoReasonableDoubt wrote:

---

All 1st Team, which 99.99% of the time means your an AS.
this.

but id love to be in the all-star game...i mean to be part of that weekend is something special