Bend_The_Knee
formerly gotholesinmysocks
- 61,766
- 23,511
- Joined
- Apr 11, 2008
^i rember havin that toy of bret hart w/ the belt....wonder how much those toys from those times go for now
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
TNA President Dixie Carter placed the blame on Impact's 0.6 cable rating on Shawn Michaels' retirement. She tweeted the following:
Thank goodness he can only retire once...hopefully. Shawn, congrats on an amazing career!
This broad is delusional.I really wish TNA could get it together, the have a lot talent but no direction; I hope the move to 8pm will help them.
They need to stop pushing Abyss and AJ as the new Hogan and Flair.
@ the N&N trademark.
The IC Title is currently just a prop for The Miz, but it will eventually be factored in to his program with Daniel Brian.Originally Posted by jmal519
There is NO prestige w/ the titles anymore.
The IC championship wasn't even defended @ wrestlemania this year. I don't keep up regularly w/ smackdown, but I don't even think anyone has a program going w/ McIntyre.
The US title is now just an accessory for the Miz.
The Royal Rumble means a LOT less than it used to. Remember when we used to actually TRULY route for someone (ie. Stone Cold) b/c for months they've had a great build-up going into the Royal Rumble, which made their win @ Wrestlemania even sweeter.
How does Cena have 9 title reigns in 5 years (I think), while Bret Hart has only had 5 in 5 years (92 - 97)? I'm not saying the Bret deserved more or that Cena doesn't deserve to be champ. It just goes to show how much the title has been thrown around.
Give me a break. All the titles have been defended at all the recent PPVS including a non advertised US title match at the Rumble, or EC..I don't remember which right now. As far as the titles not being defended at this Mania well we all have to make an exception because of Hart/Michaels. And really the only title that is getting bounced around too much is the WWE title.Originally Posted by 4wrestling
The IC Title is currently just a prop for The Miz, but it will eventually be factored in to his program with Daniel Brian.Originally Posted by jmal519
There is NO prestige w/ the titles anymore.
The IC championship wasn't even defended @ wrestlemania this year. I don't keep up regularly w/ smackdown, but I don't even think anyone has a program going w/ McIntyre.
The US title is now just an accessory for the Miz.
The Royal Rumble means a LOT less than it used to. Remember when we used to actually TRULY route for someone (ie. Stone Cold) b/c for months they've had a great build-up going into the Royal Rumble, which made their win @ Wrestlemania even sweeter.
How does Cena have 9 title reigns in 5 years (I think), while Bret Hart has only had 5 in 5 years (92 - 97)? I'm not saying the Bret deserved more or that Cena doesn't deserve to be champ. It just goes to show how much the title has been thrown around.
I have said for years that they should do away with the PPV between The Royal Rumble and WrestleMania, or at least make it that the Rumble winner picks his opponent after the Rumble and that match is set in stone for Mania. I don't like the title or rumble winner stipulation changing hands at No Way Out/Elimination Chamber.
And yes, there are obviously too many belts and arbitrary title changes.
Between 1998 and 2002 (4 years) The Rock also had 9 title reigns. Just SayinOriginally Posted by jmal519
How does Cena have 9 title reigns in 5 years (I think), while Bret Hart has only had 5 in 5 years (92 - 97)? I'm not saying the Bret deserved more or that Cena doesn't deserve to be champ. It just goes to show how much the title has been thrown around.
Originally Posted by DangerousG
Between 1998 and 2002 (4 years) The Rock also had 9 title reigns. Just SayinOriginally Posted by jmal519
How does Cena have 9 title reigns in 5 years (I think), while Bret Hart has only had 5 in 5 years (92 - 97)? I'm not saying the Bret deserved more or that Cena doesn't deserve to be champ. It just goes to show how much the title has been thrown around.
*Fixed.Originally Posted by Florshine
just like they(wwe) trust the rock back then holding the strap,in same they do for cena. and ive said it before an ill say it again,*The WWE wants John cena to be this generations hulk hogan.*
He not there yet but its hard to argue against it. He is more entertaining to me then Hulk and is more athletic.Originally Posted by Florshine
just like they(wwe) trust the rock back then holding the strap,in same they do for cena. and ive said it before an ill say it again,John cena is this generations hulk hogan.