You can't honestly think adding more teams will improve the quality of the MLS do you? Talent will be thinned out so much it will take hardcore fans to actually appreciate a Houston Dynamo v. Philadelphia Union match.
Not at all. At the crux of my argument is the notion that satisfying market demand and increasing quality of play are not mutually exclusively.
I stated from the very beginning that continued expansion within reason, in a manner that's strategic and consistent with what we've seen in the last decade, will not lower the quality of play.
I know a lot of people here didn't follow MLS in 2005 but I did. The league is of astronomically higher quality today than it was then, and it's nearly doubled in size in terms of teams, and it's more than doubled in size in terms of players under contract. The objective empirical evidence is there to support that claim.
The term mass expansion isn't applicable to MLS either. MLS expansion has been slow, steady, and impeccably strategic. We're not talking about expanding the league to 30 teams over night, we're talking about the exact same incredibly well documented process that's taken place for the past 10-12 years. The addition of 1 - 2 extremely well vetted markets, every 3 - 4 years.
I believe the Eredivisie is superior to the MLS why? Because they develop players that go on to top clubs in Europe. You cant say the same for the MLS. The Netherlands itself develop world class players that go on to play for their own National Team and succeed in international competition. A nation of 17 mill vs 350 mill. Bigger is not always better and in this case I don't think mass expansion will benefit the MLS at all.
I think there's a serious flaw in that method of evaluating league quality. Do a small subset of of players from the Eredivisie go on to top clubs in Europe? Yes, but the vast majority of them don't and will never play in a league better than the Eredivise.
Does the Eredivisie produce a disproportionate amount of talent that matriculates up to the top leagues in Europe? Yes, but you still can't use the top 10% of players who happen to pass through the league as your benchmark when comparing the league as a whole to others. Luis Suarez and Christian Ericksen are the exception and not the rule. Completely disregarding the fact that the Eredivisie is a developmental league and MLS isn't, that's already flawed logic.
Here's a link to Earnier Stewarts thoughts directly comparing the two leagues. As he mentions you can't compare leagues in a vacuum. It's nuanced and largely depends on how you frame things. Ajax, PSV and Feyenord have players in their reserve set ups that might be in the upper 90th percentile of MLS talent. Meanwhile Willem II and Excelsior would get washed by MLS playoff teams.
I didn't say MLS was superior to the Eredivisie, my point was that the gap between Roda, Vitesse, Heerenveen, etc and the average MLS club isn't quite what people think.