- Apr 4, 2009
- 6,126
- 10
Agree on almost everything. Regarding Parker, I'm hearing he is pretty much ours already at the moment (obviously could change). If I had tochoose between Baxter and Parker though, I'd take Baxter in a second (even with our defensive needs). Parker seems a bit chubby to me. I don't knowwhere he would fit in on D right away. Baxter comes in and is starting at RB day 1.Originally Posted by zs05wc
Dude I'm glad Gardner is coming to UofM but if we have to rely on another frosh QB thats bad. Very bad. We had the top scoring offense in the B10 (inflated a little by the DSU game sure). Offensive skill players aren't our problem. We need defense right now. Sean Parker should be our number one concern.
Comparing Gardner to White is like apples and oranges IMO, D. Robinson is more comparable to White. And to be honest I would kind of hope something clicks w/ Robinson because I think he could be more dangerous than Tate in this offense. DG needs a redshirt esp. since he got #+!%%% on enrolling early.
Denard is definitely more comparable to White than Gardner. I was never trying to compare the 2 head to head in the first place.
Agree 100% regarding Tate and D-Rob. I really hope Denard beats out Tate. If Denard learns how to read a defense/make good decisions he could be dangerous ashell.
And I agree about the redshirt. If he was in there now, I would have said let the best man start come the fall, but he'll be so far behind now (just likeD-Rob was last year).
Best case scenario IMO, is D-Rob improves enough to beat out Forcier and plays well enough to keep Rich Rod his job. Then Devin starts as a RS frosh withDenard in the slot.