- 2,374
- 10
- Joined
- Mar 4, 2007
i dont c it ....... i pass by here everyday at random hours.... guess i gotta re-route.....
2009 Most Deadliest Cities thus far
- Thread in 'General' Thread starter Started by dacityslanga,
- Start date
i dont c it ....... i pass by here everyday at random hours.... guess i gotta re-route.....
thefoteenth
Banned
- 740
- 10
- Joined
- Sep 30, 2008
5 Oakland, CA
9 Richmond, CA
17 Compton, CA
Cali
Usually we got Frisco up there too.
- 17,303
- 8,994
- Joined
- Oct 8, 2003
What did I say about NY goons last time?
sirius lee handsome
Banned
- 9,918
- 12
- Joined
- Feb 26, 2009
What?
49ers650
Banned
- 826
- 10
- Joined
- Nov 7, 2007
Cali
Usually we got Frisco up there too.
Yeah, that one time in 1968 with the Zodiac
- 2,654
- 57
- Joined
- Apr 19, 2007
No NY. Now THAT deserves a
(P.S. Being on this list is a bad thing)
(P.S. Being on this list is a bad thing)
thefoteenth
Banned
- 740
- 10
- Joined
- Sep 30, 2008
Cali
Usually we got Frisco up there too.
Yeah, that one time in 1968 with the Zodiac
Go to double rock buddy.
- 17,303
- 8,994
- Joined
- Oct 8, 2003
They're soft.
trueblack88
Banned
- 707
- 10
- Joined
- Mar 20, 2008
Really? In all relativity, I never thought D.C. was too bad. I live in Moco but even the 'bad' parts of D.C. aren't even close tosay...the 'semi-bad' parts of Baltimore. Now THAT'S a rough city...
- 2,374
- 10
- Joined
- Mar 4, 2007
Disney World is in Kissimmee go outside kissimmee n ull c some hoodshyt...Originally Posted by BritEyes12
18 Orlando, FL
@%%!$#$ Disney world.Yeah ok.
- 4,258
- 13
- Joined
- Feb 15, 2009
No Seattle. Or any city in Washington
- 2,368
- 10
- Joined
- Mar 5, 2008
Jackson, MS
- 2,253
- 289
- Joined
- Jul 20, 2002
Bmore is indeed no joke
I'm glad to see D.C. has gone down the list, but we ALL know once summer hits, game over. They gone have the whole N.E. section blocked off again, andS.E., well you already know
On a positive note, looks like Richmond, Va has improved a lot. I remember seeing them on these types of lists for a while.
Yeah, that one time in 1968 with the ZodiacOriginally Posted by TheFoteenth
Cali
Usually we got Frisco up there too.
Go to double rock buddy.
Exactly, I'd imagine SF has been "cleaned" up a bit since the 90's....a lot of folks probably got priced out of the city andmoved across the Bay....
Hell, East Palo Alto was one of the worlds worst cities at one point.
- 873
- 10
- Joined
- Feb 25, 2008
these towns are literally 5 minutes away from eachother
- 11,980
- 18
- Joined
- Feb 21, 2005
Dude your a @!$%*%# loser honestly. No one like you on this site and you come in here and make these little stupid @!$%*%# comments. Come to New York andI'll put you on the subway to Brownsville.
- 873
- 10
- Joined
- Feb 25, 2008
quick question, is it me or does all of NY get EXTREMELY butthurt anyone says anything about them. ******ed
thefoteenth
Banned
- 740
- 10
- Joined
- Sep 30, 2008
Originally Posted by LazyJ10
Yeah, that one time in 1968 with the ZodiacOriginally Posted by TheFoteenth
Cali
Usually we got Frisco up there too.
Go to double rock buddy.
Exactly, I'd imagine SF has been "cleaned" up a bit since the 90's....a lot of folks probably got priced out of the city and moved across the Bay....
Hell, East Palo Alto was one of the worlds worst cities at one point.
To be honest, no. Richmond and Frisco are stillt he only cities in the bay they dont have renovated projects. All oaklands projects got torn down or renovated,still dangerous but so is Frisco's.
- 11,513
- 51
- Joined
- Apr 4, 2007
Or a bit higher.
- 10,363
- 33
- Joined
- May 9, 2006
It's basically always been like that. Birmingham is getting bad though. Dudes killing for no reason. They trying to make themselves the kings of Alabama.
Exactly, I'd imagine SF has been "cleaned" up a bit since the 90's....a lot of folks probably got priced out of the city and moved across the Bay....Originally Posted by TheFoteenth
Originally Posted by LazyJ10
Yeah, that one time in 1968 with the ZodiacOriginally Posted by TheFoteenth
Cali
Usually we got Frisco up there too.Well Im not going to argue with you because its nothing to be proud of but SF is usually in the top 25-30 deadliest cities.
Go to double rock buddy.
Hell, East Palo Alto was one of the worlds worst cities at one point.
To be honest, no. Richmond and Frisco are stillt he only cities in the bay they dont have renovated projects. All oaklands projects got torn down or renovated, still dangerous but so is Frisco's.
The projects aren't the only area in which crime or violent crime is taking place. Look around SoMa, Mission Bay, and the rest of thesurrounding area. Although Hunter's Point remains much of the same, some of the other areas are changing.
- 10,363
- 33
- Joined
- May 9, 2006
We're in 2009, not the late 80s/early 90s.
- 299
- 10
- Joined
- Sep 27, 2005
Originally Posted by SleepyBlueDemon
Originally Posted by DaCitySlanga
Think some other cities should had been on here. I mean Little Rock is gangsta?
Someone didn't have HBO as a kid...
thank you. "gangbanging in Little Rock"
- 1,328
- 11
- Joined
- Jan 4, 2009
This list can be attributed partly to the quality of education. (In the south atleast, idk how the public schools are in the bay)
Education= Less Crime.
South = Crime
South =/= Education.
Education= Less Crime.
South = Crime
South =/= Education.
- 1,005
- 10
- Joined
- Jun 26, 2008
I hate the word Frisco. But it would have made the list if we were talking about the 90's. Its not as rough anymore with the gentrification. They'vebeen knocking down all the projects. I remember watching the Geneva Towers going down from my backyard. And the D.A brought injunctions against all the biggangs in The City.
