- 37,287
- 19,666
- Joined
- Nov 17, 2004
USC does WORK!!!Originally Posted by CP1708
USC won 5 bowl games last season!!!! GOOOOO USC!
LOLNOTANATIONALCHAMPIONSHIPSOITDOESNTMATTERLOLIMLAMELOL
2009 official Pac-10 football post
- Thread in 'Sports & Training' Thread starter Started by 92,
- Start date
USC won 5 bowl games last season!!!! GOOOOO USC!
LOLNOTANATIONALCHAMPIONSHIPSOITDOESNTMATTERLOLIMLAMELOL
- 6,402
- 193
- Joined
- Nov 5, 2007
USC does WORK!!!Originally Posted by CP1708
Now if only the so-called U could do the same.
I, CP1708, by quoting this and making a witty remark referring to the Pac-9 or any witty remark related hereby confess thatthe Miami Hurricanes suck regardless of their history.
- 1,812
- 10
- Joined
- Jun 14, 2007
Originally Posted by 541 Exile 562
Marvin Jones - (RS) FR - WR : I don't trust Boateng, so I see him becoming Cal's #1 receiving threat, that and I saw him a little bit in HS and he looked dangerous. It also looks like he chose #1, which means he's probably talented but also kind of an a**hole. I don't have much else to go by but that.
- 37,287
- 19,666
- Joined
- Nov 17, 2004
Bowl games aren't meaningless. But good try, though... C+ for effort.
And yeah, we know the way CP thinks... "blah blah blah champion blah blah blah".
This isn't some league where there's only 32 teams. Bowl games mean something, and your opinion on the matter blows donkey @+*%.
- 6,402
- 193
- Joined
- Nov 5, 2007
- 37,287
- 19,666
- Joined
- Nov 17, 2004
And CP, it's not your fault. If I had my way, we'd have a WAYYYYYYYYY better way to determining National Champions than just the rankings, SoS,computer, etc... a playoff system would be amazing so people could actually see the match-ups they want to see.
Instead of going "well so and so would beat so and so" we'd actually HAVE those match-ups, and cross-conference games, and some way to judgeteams.
It sucks because some teams *COUGH*OHIO STATE*COUGH* always come into the season ranked high as +#@@, lose the one tough game on their schedule, win out thenplay in a BCS game in which they get absolutely obliterated.
If there were some sort of better system in place, I would agree with you 100% on the NC argument. In other sports, the championship is all that matters... noall-stars, no 66-game seasons, nothing... but CFB is a different beast in itself.
/endrant
Instead of going "well so and so would beat so and so" we'd actually HAVE those match-ups, and cross-conference games, and some way to judgeteams.
It sucks because some teams *COUGH*OHIO STATE*COUGH* always come into the season ranked high as +#@@, lose the one tough game on their schedule, win out thenplay in a BCS game in which they get absolutely obliterated.
If there were some sort of better system in place, I would agree with you 100% on the NC argument. In other sports, the championship is all that matters... noall-stars, no 66-game seasons, nothing... but CFB is a different beast in itself.
/endrant
^
Yeah I agree on that, it's part of why I don't see the drama in getting hyped over bowl games and what not. I get they're important to theschools, I get they mean something to fans, but to be the elite of the elite, you want it all, or damn near close to it every single time.
Hence my beef with the conference. SEC, Big 12, Big 10, and even the down ACC (though, not this current configuration) have teams that have battled for yearsand years. Ohio St, though highly overrated, ALWAYS in there. Mich (usually), Ok, Texas, damn near 9 SEC teams,
always in that mix.
Not in this one. They have a team make a nice run. UO in 2000 or 01. (Year you beat Colorado) Cal was tough, Wash in the early 90's. But then theyturn to crap the next year or five. They can't sonsistently put out dominant teams for 10-12 year stretches. All those schools I mentioned have and willagain.
But SC is the one that always ups them numbers. That ain't hate on me, ya'll know it.
Yeah I agree on that, it's part of why I don't see the drama in getting hyped over bowl games and what not. I get they're important to theschools, I get they mean something to fans, but to be the elite of the elite, you want it all, or damn near close to it every single time.
Hence my beef with the conference. SEC, Big 12, Big 10, and even the down ACC (though, not this current configuration) have teams that have battled for yearsand years. Ohio St, though highly overrated, ALWAYS in there. Mich (usually), Ok, Texas, damn near 9 SEC teams,
Not in this one. They have a team make a nice run. UO in 2000 or 01. (Year you beat Colorado) Cal was tough, Wash in the early 90's. But then theyturn to crap the next year or five. They can't sonsistently put out dominant teams for 10-12 year stretches. All those schools I mentioned have and willagain.
But SC is the one that always ups them numbers. That ain't hate on me, ya'll know it.
- 74
- 14
- Joined
- Feb 28, 2006
541 Exile 562 wrote:
No one from ASU or WSU really stood out for me.
dexter davis not good enough for you? back-to-back years 10+ sacks
2007: 10.5 sacks
2008: 11 sacks
- 10,038
- 2,188
- Joined
- Feb 13, 2001
Someone still salty UM lost to CAL
- 120
- 10
- Joined
- Sep 23, 2006
dexter davis not good enough for you? back-to-back years 10+ sacks
2007: 10.5 sacks
2008: 11 sacks
Yo sorry, I meant there weren't really any players I knew a whole lot about that also fit the criteria I was looking for. I didn't wantto put a player from each team just for the sake of listing 10 guys, I wanted to list players who piqued my interest for one reason or another.
As for this whole Pac-10 discussion :
As long as USC remains as by far the most dominant out of conference team in the nation, Pac-10 supporters will continue to argue that USC would have hadthis kind of dominance in any other 10 team conference. You're sick of us defending ourselves? Don't let SC beat the SEC west champion by 40 points.Don't let them win the national championship in the most convincing fashion we've seen in decades. Don't let them win every. single. BCS game. byan average of 35 points. Don't let every single "high-caliber" match-up they have with the SEC, or the ACC, or the Big-10, turn into a completelet-down where the opposing team's manhood is taken from them late in the 3rd quarter. That's all we ask.
Look at the ACC the past 8 years. Give me one good reason why USC wouldn't have won it every single year. Or the Big Ten. Or the Big East. Look at howsoft Ohio St. is out of conference compared to their own conference and tell me the Big-10 doesn't deserve more criticism than the Pac-10.
Q : Just how dominant would USC have to be against teams outside their own conference to convince you they'd bejust as dominant anywhere else with the exception of the Big-12 or the SEC?
- 4,769
- 11
- Joined
- May 14, 2007
Stop that.Originally Posted by ninjallamafromhell
- 6,402
- 193
- Joined
- Nov 5, 2007
Originally Posted by Mr Fizzy Womack
Stop that.Originally Posted by ninjallamafromhell
- 3,215
- 54
- Joined
- Nov 27, 2008
Arizona being 8th
Pac-10 will see.
Pac-10 will see.
- 2,143
- 25
- Joined
- Apr 2, 2009
Originally Posted by Dwadefan
Arizona being 8th
Pac-10 will see.
who cares youll finish 4th at best playing in some meaningless gowl game.
- 4,172
- 10
- Joined
- Feb 22, 2007
Originally Posted by Matt Barkley Heisman Number 8
Originally Posted by Dwadefan
Arizona being 8th
Pac-10 will see.
who cares youll finish 4th at best playing in some meaningless gowl game.
yeah but the point is to make a somewhat realistic prediction. UW above zona is a joke. Arizona will be better than that, they have a solid squad.
- 3,215
- 54
- Joined
- Nov 27, 2008
At least we don't do shady things like you're program. USC basketball hiring KO just makes me laugh at your program even more.Originally Posted by Matt Barkley Heisman Number 8
Originally Posted by Dwadefan
Arizona being 8th
Pac-10 will see.
who cares youll finish 4th at best playing in some meaningless gowl game.
- 6,131
- 14
- Joined
- Apr 15, 2007
Word.Originally Posted by Dwadefan
At least we don't do shady things like you're program. USC basketball hiring KO just makes me laugh at your program even more.Originally Posted by Matt Barkley Heisman Number 8
Originally Posted by Dwadefan
Arizona being 8th
Pac-10 will see.
who cares youll finish 4th at best playing in some meaningless gowl game.
It's like we're a football school or anything
But when they make those additions to the stadium
- 1,812
- 10
- Joined
- Jun 14, 2007
when does Cal open up fall camp?
- 6,722
- 1,170
- Joined
- Sep 19, 2007
Thread revival. What are your thoughts so far on the season for the Pac-10?
My rankings so far
1. USC
2. Cal
3. Oregon State
4. UCLA
5. Arizona
6. Arizona State
7. Washington
8. Oregon
9. Stanford
10. Washington State
My rankings so far
1. USC
2. Cal
3. Oregon State
4. UCLA
5. Arizona
6. Arizona State
7. Washington
8. Oregon
9. Stanford
10. Washington State
- 58,161
- 29,603
- Joined
- Feb 12, 2005
I'm putting USC on upset alert. Washington will play them down to the wire on saturday and I'll go as far as saying I got Washington winning.
The line is USC -21. Jump on it quick.
The line is USC -21. Jump on it quick.
- 6,722
- 1,170
- Joined
- Sep 19, 2007
I agree that it could be a trap game for USC thinking Washington is a weak team. Washington played LSU tough first week and isn't a team to over look, I amtorn on whether I want them to lose though. Ideally I would like both USC and Cal to go undefeated til they play Oregon St., then have the Beavers beat 2highly ranked teams and move up into the Rose bowl position, but any day USC loses is a good day.
- 8,259
- 573
- Joined
- Dec 18, 2008
Yup, USC better not take the dawgs softly. Locker is about to play his heart out but it still won't be enough, our defense is just
How you gonna let IDAHO throw for 300 something yards
