- 1,017
- 238
leo & samuel L should've gotten nods
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I haven't seen The Sessions yet, but I know how great Hawkes can be so I don't doubt it.
Cooper was the best he's ever been, but I wouldn't be outraged if he didn't get nominated.
I'd put in Hawkes over DeNiro in a heartbeat.
Nothing against the GOAT, but Hawkes was amazing as Mark O'Brien.
I'm an idiot. You're right.
With that said, I'd take out Cooper.. even he was great as well, best he's ever been but not as good as Hawkes. Might seem like I'm hating on SLP, but I loved everything about it.. but John Hawkes was better than either Cooper or Hugh Jackman were.
I'm aware now venom, stop pointing out my mistake.
To each their own, I just think Hawkes performance had much more depth and was a harder role to pull off.. I think Hawkes could of played the role Cooper did just as well as he did, but could Cooper of played the man with the Iron Lung?
Bringing up things that don't matter again... but if Gosling didn't get one for Blue Valentine a few year ago- what did Cooper do better than him that warrants a nom? These are all subjective and don't really matter at all, but I'm just saying... his performance wasn't anything THAT spectacular.. he was a great in it, and I'm happy he got one I just feel John was more deserving and I'm really surprised because the Sessions itself had Oscar bait written all over it.
Sidenote: I'm excited for the Globes tonight, I personally enjoy the show more than I do the Oscars.