Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The only signing that'll give us a championship immediately is Bron / Melo, and it aint happening. With signing two above average players, and gathering a decent bench, we could be competitive along with gaining youth.Melo alone, or Lance/Bledsoe still leaves us without a title.
But if I had to choose, I agree, Lance/Bledsoe over Melo.
Anyone believe we have a legit chance at Lance?
has anyone looked at Avery Bradleys situation in Boston, hes restricted but with Boston drafting Smart any thought/ the lakers might have a chance at stealing from them at what may be a lower cost than bledsoe
Nice E, I was wondering what the cap situation would look like with lance/bledsoe. Can you bring back pau using bird rights in that scenario? Basically there's no way to get lance/bledsoe this summer and be able to afford an amir johnson next summer?
Those physical gifts will be a part of his arsenal for a while. Father Time might limit his ability to add to that collection, but it's deep enough already for him to make an impact at the game's highest level.Kane has an excellent physical make-up, as he has a strong, developed frame while being measured at 6'4". He is quick with the ball in his hands, which helps him lead one of the fastest offensive teams when they want to run in transition. He has an adequate wingspan for a player of his size and great leaping ability to complement his strength and quickness.
His promise to help today is high, and it's not like he is running short on tomorrows, either.The biggest thing about DeAndre is just his versatility. That's what you look for in the NBA. He's got positional size. He's a 6-5 point guard. He's very fast with the basketball. His game does translate to the next level and he's shot the ball extremely well, especially the last six weeks of the season. Plus he defends and competes at the defensive end of the floor.
http://grantland.com/the-triangle/g...e-jason-kidd-mess-has-a-144-million-pricetag/• The Thunder are indeed paying into the revenue-sharing system, rare for such a tiny market, but they’re slated to make nearly $29 million in profit when everything is netted out. That’s the fifth-best projection in the league, trailing only the Lakers ($100.1 million), Bulls ($61 million), Rockets ($40.7 million), and Celtics ($33.1 million). Again: This memo does not capture the complete financial picture for any organization, but between this estimated profit and the general escalating value of all NBA franchises, it’s fair to take these numbers into account when debating the Thunder’s decision to trade James Harden and duck the luxury tax.
• Holy cow, the Lakers! They end up with that huge profit despite contributing a league-high $49 million to revenue-sharing. The league’s revenue-sharing is complex, with payouts and contributions tied to all sorts of variables — market size, profitability, earnings benchmarks, and other stuff. A few teams, including the Lakers and Knicks, play in markets so large they are disqualified from ever receiving revenue-sharing payouts.