- 23,933
- 5,933
Ska, If those are the options then fine I'll take a stand.
"Depends on the conditions."
"Depends on the conditions."
Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Your avi, lion kingSka, If those are the options then fine I'll take a stand.
"Depends on the conditions."
Your avi, lion kingSka, If those are the options then fine I'll take a stand.
"Depends on the conditions."
I mean CP in a perfect world what do you want? And is what you want something that actually makes sense?
Bear in mind Kobe is a Laker and will be a Laker for two more years. And his salary isn't going away until his contract is up.
What do you want?
Do you want Kobe Bryant on the Lakers? Yes, or No.It's too late for perfect world. I don't want Kobe on the Lakers for 48.5 million dollars. The end.I mean CP in a perfect world what do you want? And is what you want something that actually makes sense?
Bear in mind Kobe is a Laker and will be a Laker for two more years. And his salary isn't going away until his contract is up.
What do you want?
If he took less money, I would have no problem having him on the roster for 2 more years.
So what I want, is to correct his failure of a contract, by getting younger, cheaper, assets in hand, by keeping our top 5 protected lottery pick.
Just because Mitch, Jim and Jeanie are ******* idiots and pay for past performance, means I have to agree with it in any way shape or form. I want to pay for FUTURE performance, and Kobe is in no way worth 48 million, ON THE COURT, the next two years.
We got the boot, L2B.
Melo is not a perfect 10 but a core of melo/randle should have championship potential.
It's too late for perfect world. I don't want Kobe on the Lakers for 48.5 million dollars. The end.
If he took less money, I would have no problem having him on the roster for 2 more years.
So what I want, is to correct his failure of a contract, by getting younger, cheaper, assets in hand, by keeping our top 5 protected lottery pick.
Just because Mitch, Jim and Jeanie are ******* idiots and pay for past performance, means I have to agree with it in any way shape or form. I want to pay for FUTURE performance, and Kobe is in no way worth 48 million, ON THE COURT, the next two years.
^ How much of both of their game have you seen with your own eyes, truthfully?
if you wanted cliffs, just ask for it:Without reading any of that post I'm going to guess it covered the following 3 subjects:
Tanking
Kobe's contract
Salary cap
Nobody knows what kobe will look like coming back and I believe very few in this thread really watch melo and randle play. Fair but not enough to instantly dismiss as if it's a team of pierce kg and Anthony bennett.
Melo - a lot of games. Randle his highschool highlights, and most of his March Madness run.
But what does your question even mean? I like Randle but he hasn't even played in the NBA yet(hopefully he becomes a beast). At least let the man play first and then talk about 'championship potential'.
So you want the Lakers to be bad, get a top 5 pick and hope it works out?
I think we know why they didn't pay shaq.....