- 4,526
- 4,446
- Joined
- Mar 22, 2007
Point differential or wins? What's more important.
Bottom line is, if it matters, the Cavs are only 3 games down in head to head matchups over the last 3 years and one game down in the finals. Both teams have a ring. So the narrative that you picked up on from skip bayless or ESPN just doesn't hold up.
What really matters (at least to me) is both teams are 1-1 in the finals.
I could easily say... "the Cavs are dominating gsw, they've won 5 of the last 7 games vs. gsw and have 1 ring to show for their dominance." Its true, but in the end, what does it even matter? Its a useless stat. Just like your point differential and sample size for your bogus dominance claim.
One would figure you'd get enough of being wrong, but apparently not. We're not gonna move goal posts. Golden State was in fact stomping a mud hole in Cleveland. That is a fact. You tried to refute the claim, talking about facts so here's some facts golden state has won their games by margins of 18,8,21,13,8,6,34,15,33, and 11. Yes they were absolutely vastly superior. It's not a narrative that's, as you so eloquently described it, facts. If wins matter, Golden State has more. In those wins, they've demolished the Cavs. They were the better team in 15,16 and they are now.