- Jul 1, 2008
- 14,899
- 20,198
You're trolling right? You don't deadass believe this?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
2000s didnt have 3mLooking at the pics more I have to say I like these more than the 2000 retro aesthetically. Two pairs for me.
believe what?
So hyped to have these with NA again, but think I'll just keep them on ice and beat up my 2014's.
Still waiting.. hoping that's not actually official. That boot is still there..
If it ends up being a 2014 with NA and better red (which is what that looks like).. I'll just do 1 pair.
2000 still beats these. Contrast heel seems dead at this point. Oh well, much better than the 2010 and 2014.
Nike Air been skipping meals
In for 2
It is what it isDamn... well the only way we could force them to do better is by not buying, but we all know that's not going to happen. I'm in for 2 as well. Best since 2000. Just like the BC 3 was best since 01. At least the new retros have some OG features. Some is better than none.
Curious, the sole appears to be more blue on these than the GS official pics. Is this pair to pair?
It is disappointing to know that they put a decent amount of effort into the Concord release, but less effort into these. You think the brand would hold this shoe in a higher regard given its significance to MJ's career.
infrared on the right, sunbleached infrared (salmon 14) on the left
its a shade of red with touch of orange over it