- 32,830
- 24,896
- Joined
- Sep 23, 2012
Hated the 2014’s the minute I saw them. They’re so disrespectful to the integrity of what Tinker initially created.
2019 All Star Black Infrared Air Jordan 6
- Thread in 'Jordan Brand' Thread starter Started by Aquamanjay_,
- Start date
- 55,346
- 62,834
- Joined
- May 15, 2003
always happens when the new version of something comes out.
You used to have the same debates about how they're supposed to be pink
- 38,490
- 76,023
- Joined
- Apr 5, 2008
To many they was extremely uncomfortable me included
Last edited:
- 759
- 1,051
- Joined
- Apr 4, 2016
100% agree with the no .5 down argument. I always got 10's then NT made me more aware of cracking. I went through a phase questioning that ten including a colossal fail of me buying a $190 pair of 9.0 motorsports I have sitting here with 4 wears I am overdue to sell.
Now I still sometimes question if Im now trusting the shoe companies and should be trying on shoes individually but that seems like a frustrating game and I dont ever have problems wearing 10's at least so Im going to play it safe with them and not overthink it. I do have some 9.5's that fit well the latest AM90 fit perfectly in a 9.5 but other then those I dont think its worth the frustration to try to fit .5 down when possible.
Now I still sometimes question if Im now trusting the shoe companies and should be trying on shoes individually but that seems like a frustrating game and I dont ever have problems wearing 10's at least so Im going to play it safe with them and not overthink it. I do have some 9.5's that fit well the latest AM90 fit perfectly in a 9.5 but other then those I dont think its worth the frustration to try to fit .5 down when possible.
Aquamanjay_
formerly jaylaw15
- 8,180
- 9,262
- Joined
- Dec 18, 2014
I knew they were a bit more pink than the 1991, but I didn’t really care that much or enough to trash them. But you’re right about the new to older pair thing. Although, with a lot of remasters like the Aqua 8 and Concord 11, idk what the next pair of those could even do to be better. Since they’re almost copies of the OG, what would they do?
Aquamanjay_
formerly jaylaw15
- 8,180
- 9,262
- Joined
- Dec 18, 2014
Only time a size 9.5 worked is with the 2018 Shadow 10. To increase my raffle chances, I entered in one 9.5 raffle and that’s the only raffle I won lol. Fits perfectly. 2016 Banned 1s Size 10 fit like a 10.5
- 7,044
- 6,632
- Joined
- Nov 25, 2003
In hindsight, except for the toe box I didn’t really mind the ‘14’s much since it was my first infras since the og in 6th grade.
- 32,830
- 24,896
- Joined
- Sep 23, 2012
I have 2018 Shadow X’s in my actual size which is sz 10 and they such a perfect/snug fit. I couldn’t imagine sizing down to a 9.5, I’d barely be able to get the shoe on. You’re spot on about 2016 Black/red 1’s however. I have those in a sz 10 as well and I feel like I’m swimming in them but I have the laces really loose in them which I think is the reason
- 1,786
- 1,892
- Joined
- Dec 1, 2012
Okay these look almost perfect on feet. Only thing I dislike is the blue outsole
AWOKEN CHARISMA
formerly monopolize
- 3,509
- 4,826
- Joined
- May 30, 2013
Color wise,,,
Vars 6s->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> 2014 infrapinks...
I maybe in the minority on this forum stating that, but Im bias towards darker reds, being 1st 6 I owned was the 2000 deep infrareds.
However, I played on a hoop team in the early 90s, where I had 2 teammates that had the black infrareds , & I can say honestly they was more red than anything, with a hint of bright orange.
2014s version are the epitome of blasphemy .
More so than any other version of black infrared 6s have ever been..
Yes ,Nike Air on the back of infrareds is long past due, thats for certain, that could be reason enough for a new infra 6.
Although that doesnt excuse that nike knew they botched that last release , which is why I think we're seeing a retro only 4-5 yrs past that drop.
Vars 6s->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> 2014 infrapinks...
I maybe in the minority on this forum stating that, but Im bias towards darker reds, being 1st 6 I owned was the 2000 deep infrareds.
However, I played on a hoop team in the early 90s, where I had 2 teammates that had the black infrareds , & I can say honestly they was more red than anything, with a hint of bright orange.
2014s version are the epitome of blasphemy .
More so than any other version of black infrared 6s have ever been..
Yes ,Nike Air on the back of infrareds is long past due, thats for certain, that could be reason enough for a new infra 6.
Although that doesnt excuse that nike knew they botched that last release , which is why I think we're seeing a retro only 4-5 yrs past that drop.
- 38,490
- 76,023
- Joined
- Apr 5, 2008
- 148
- 110
- Joined
- Dec 27, 2013
- 20,053
- 17,946
- Joined
- Jan 19, 2007
VI's do run big so side footers yall be fine.
narrow/regular fit should get half size down or try them on if you can for your preferred fit. Like I said, the 2017 ASG VI's ran big, and prior to that the 2010 VI's ran big.
2014 VI were trash.
narrow/regular fit should get half size down or try them on if you can for your preferred fit. Like I said, the 2017 ASG VI's ran big, and prior to that the 2010 VI's ran big.
2014 VI were trash.
Aquamanjay_
formerly jaylaw15
- 8,180
- 9,262
- Joined
- Dec 18, 2014
I definitely think JB rushed to remaster the most controversial pairs from 2011-2015.
In regard to the color, based on all the pics and videos I’ve seen, and the accounts of 91 pair owners, if we’re talking proximity to the 1991, it’s 2019, 2014, 2000, Infrared Pack, then 2010 Varsity.
The 2014 is a little brighter than the 2019. Guy sent my photos of his 91 and 19 pairs, and the color was more or less identical. The 2000 is noticeably darker than the ‘19, pack is a little darker than those, and the Varsity is darker than those by a couple shades.
AWOKEN CHARISMA
formerly monopolize
- 3,509
- 4,826
- Joined
- May 30, 2013
14s are Still quite a few shades off of the 91s.
When I mentioned 2010 I was speaking on my preference in red, not how close they are to the 91s.
Last edited:
- 25,769
- 18,825
- Joined
- Aug 10, 2003
Never liked the 2014. Never wore them much either. Besides the pink color they were bricks on your feet. Glad I sold them though. I traded the 2nd pair for wotherspoon air maxes
- 2,647
- 2,624
- Joined
- Feb 18, 2015
I honestly didn’t have a problem with the 14 having it in hand.
It was just that damn toe box feeling like a brick
Also DONT LISTEN TO ANYONES SIZING ADVICE.
There are a ton of retro 6’s out right now. Even a durabuck pair. Go try them damn shoes on
It was just that damn toe box feeling like a brick
Also DONT LISTEN TO ANYONES SIZING ADVICE.
There are a ton of retro 6’s out right now. Even a durabuck pair. Go try them damn shoes on
Aquamanjay_
formerly jaylaw15
- 8,180
- 9,262
- Joined
- Dec 18, 2014
Y
Oh, my bad. Got it
- 2,473
- 11,679
- Joined
- Oct 10, 2014
Back when the black and white infrareds dropped in 2014 it wasn’t because it was the fact it was pink. It was because it didn’t resemble the true colour that it should’ve been. And on feet they were complete bricks. The white pairs leather was absolute shhhhhhht.
The over all shape as well was terrible. I actually preferred my 2010 pack a lot more.
- 25,769
- 18,825
- Joined
- Aug 10, 2003
the color of the 2010 was spot on. Just didn't like the suede. Good quality material just not ment for the Infrareds
- 333
- 287
- Joined
- Jan 7, 2008
Can someone tell me how these fit compared to og and 2000?
- 2,223
- 1,131
- Joined
- Jul 18, 2012
- 2,473
- 11,679
- Joined
- Oct 10, 2014
Yup. That was my only gripe.
- 410
- 638
- Joined
- Dec 4, 2016
These definitely finna be a triple up .....minimum
- 28,197
- 12,543
- Joined
- Sep 28, 2003
Travis Scott rocking these during the Super Bowl half time
