2024 MLB Thread; RIP Willie Mays & Pete Rose. Dodgers win #8!

Astors got ****ed, that ball is in the stands. Betts glove is in the stands. They got played. I get it if he leaned over the wall and caught it but that didn’t happen.

Can’t believe they made that awful call and I can’t believe they called that in Houston

shut up. salty ***, timb wearing Jalen Ramsey *** dude

they got the call right. blame the HOU fans for letting you down
 
shut up. salty ***, timb wearing Jalen Ramsey *** dude

they got the call right. blame the HOU fans for letting you down

I hate y’all with a passion but if it was the other way around I’d feel the same. Fans didn’t reach over, that’s gone and a terrible call. But still mother**** you and that team.
 
I was responding to the first sentence then in conjunction with what peep said which was the same...it was clearly very wrong and set the tone for your argument.

And the rule doesn't specify what I pointed out.

It was a good call, in my opinion.
it wasn't clearly very wrong tho lol.

but alas, i don't care if the glove hit first or not. it's very possible betts could have made the catch. it's possible he misplayed it. we'll never know.

but going by the rule, i don't agree with it. you're obviously not going to agree and neither are the sox fans. but why even argue semantics in the first part of both mine and your post :lol
 
Astors got ****ed, that ball is in the stands. Betts glove is in the stands. They got played. I get it if he leaned over the wall and caught it but that didn’t happen.

Can’t believe they made that awful call and I can’t believe they called that in Houston

Spoken like a true New Yorker
 
Darling called Betts, "Mookie Wilson."

Excuse me Ron, former NY Mets pitcher - Mookie Betts & Mookie Wilson are very much not the same!
(especially to red sox fans :lol: :ohwell: )
 
giphy (1).gif
 
Why are we discussing still if Betts would have caught it. Probably would have.

The discussion is that the ball was beyond the line, so the fan does not interfere with it. If you think it was beyond the line (which I do), then the fan has every right to the ball. If you think it wasn’t, then interference is fine.

Just don’t say Betts would have caught it if the fan didn’t interfere if you honestly believe the ball was outside the field of play.

Altuve though. Salute.
 
Why are we discussing still if Betts would have caught it. Probably would have.

The discussion is that the ball was beyond the line, so the fan does not interfere with it. If you think it was beyond the line (which I do), then the fan has every right to the ball. If you think it wasn’t, then interference is fine.

Just don’t say Betts would have caught it if the fan didn’t interfere if you honestly believe the ball was outside the field of play.

Altuve though. Salute.
man's limping across home plate.

might have to stay at DH for the rest of the series.
 
Back
Top Bottom