dhtowng
Supporter
- 9,732
- 20,038
- Joined
- May 22, 2010
Damn they really that bad huh?
Crazy that people are paying $300 a pop if they're pleather.
Shoes from Rack Room probably have better leather lol.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Damn they really that bad huh?
Crazy that people are paying $300 a pop if they're pleather.
They’re truly that bad lmao, I can tell in the future they’re going to have those weird creases that stiff plastic leather have they’re not going to have natural break in creases that actually look goodDamn they really that bad huh?
Crazy that people are paying $300 a pop if they're pleather.
Seen this pic on twitter & glad I missed on the aged greens. The shininess makes them look like a womens release
It's an insult to rats to even call these rat leather, this that zip loc bag leatherYo someone in the af1 thread said rat leather once had me weak, all I can think of now
I got the Syracuse highs. I disagreethe plasticky GR highs seem to fare better than the lows for what's its worth
I love green but the shine is a turn off.Not as bad in person, held them in hand at Stadium Goods.
Waiting for my pair to get in.
Yeah it was. What I meant is that Nike seems to make shiny or metallic shoes typically womens release for whatever reason.It was a Women's release, no?
It’s just usually what Nike tends on releasing. Metallic, more vibrant colors or shiny materials are more often than none a womens release. Not saying I wouldn’t wear some because I would buy it is what it is.They were a women's release lol, and also shiny cardboard
But reminder that colors and shininess are not inherently masculine or feminine, it's just a social concept we've normalized