- 72,840
- 116,973
Why take DSJ2.0 when you already have the original?
2025 NBA Draft Thread
- Thread in 'Sports & Training' Thread starter Started by addict4sneakers,
- Start date
- 35,363
- 26,990
I was sold on JJJ because Izzo usually has no idea how to use his best talent. Coach K on the other hand?
JJJ also wasnt offensive minded.
Cam on the other hand attempts 10+ practically every game while getting close to 30mpg.
- 72,840
- 116,973
Look again. Finger slipped and accidentally hit post.Hope that’s you agreeingB Sox lol
Cam would be fine for the Knicks though.
- 28,941
- 17,603
Shooting 34% from 3 and 81 from FT? Look good for the next level.
dacomeup
Supporter
- 26,488
- 37,288
- 73,525
- 100,465
Wasn't Jaren Jackson playing like 18 MPG?
He was the textbook definition of drafting for potential. I thought he'd need more time but he's been an impact player almost instantly.
He was the textbook definition of drafting for potential. I thought he'd need more time but he's been an impact player almost instantly.
- 61,773
- 133,808
I wanted to see if JJJ was going to rebound with Gasol out of town but his leg fell off
- 72,840
- 116,973
He fouled too much.
Izzo also couldn’t somehow comprehend the idea of playing Bridges at the 4 and JJJ at the 5.
jpzx
Supporter
- 58,527
- 27,911
22 MPG, yeah everyone figured him a project worth spending that high of a pick on.
- 35,363
- 26,990
Exactly.
Na i'm off Cam. Hope he ends up being as good as ya'll say he can be, but I dont see it. I cant get behind a guy that gets that many minutes, gets plenty of opportunities, yet shoots horrendously on most nights when there's no pressure on him.
Na i'm off Cam. Hope he ends up being as good as ya'll say he can be, but I dont see it. I cant get behind a guy that gets that many minutes, gets plenty of opportunities, yet shoots horrendously on most nights when there's no pressure on him.
- 72,840
- 116,973
Not really sure if I’m loving having both Ja and DSJ on the same roster. Especially when your FA targets consist of several other high usage type players.
- 61,773
- 133,808
No pressure? I don’t know about that one
- 35,363
- 26,990
Would be completely ok with the Knicks drafting Ja or Garland.
Not on the DSJ bandwagon yet.
Not on the DSJ bandwagon yet.
- 30,549
- 33,881
Cams got the talent but he's a career volume scorer that does next to nothing when the ball isn't in his hands and disappears in games for long stretches at a time sometimes
Would like to see him put it together but I've had reservations on him since HS
Would like to see him put it together but I've had reservations on him since HS
- 73,525
- 100,465
Jarrett Culver has to be the pick if we fall to #3 or worse
- 61,773
- 133,808
His game fits if you land the big fishes
- 28,941
- 17,603
If we land the big fishes we are probably better off trading the pick
- 35,363
- 26,990
I hope we dont (ex: trading for AD).
Big fish along with cheap vets is a 3 year window. Gotta keep the young guys for after that 3 year window. Building for now and the future is the ultimate blueprint.
- 28,941
- 17,603
Lol why you editing your posts my man? You funny.
- 35,363
- 26,990
I cant add a sentence now?
- 28,941
- 17,603
- 35,363
- 26,990
Gotta chill on that refresh button buddy.
Not too invested in this draft as I was in past drafts. Only care about potential future Knicks.
Not too invested in this draft as I was in past drafts. Only care about potential future Knicks.
- 28,941
- 17,603
