Moheezy
formerly mizzoe33
- Feb 10, 2008
- 11,480
- 9,454
KAT, D'Lo and Ben.
That's a pretty solid trio where they skillset complement each other. Ben's defence will 100% be welcomed.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
KAT, D'Lo and Ben.
He's going to be playing off ball most likely wherever he goes. Not really a PG. C&S with deep range. Mechanics won't matter as much. 42% shooter from 3 on good volume and while he barely gets to the line at all, he's an 82% FT shooter when he does get there, so to me, that tells me he's a good shooter. The mechanics are weird, but the shots go in. C&S 3s, runners, and driving and kicking. Won't have the in-between game, but that shouldn't stop him from being an effective player.If Hailburton got the weird form why are some ppl so convinced he’ll make shots in the league? Don’t see anything in his game that would say he will be for sure better than Lonzo ...He was probly even a better prospect coming out
Teams should be learning, you need your lotto guards to be able to attack the rim relentlessly or score anywhere on the court off the dribble at this point in the NBA ...Check for all the other types later in the draft that don’t got the BBB marketing
I’m saying I don’t see where all the confidence in him being a legit “asset” is coming from...You been saying he will be better then Lonzo but Lonzo shot 40% from 3 in college as well and Haliburton’s ft% is on barely 2 attempts a game which is another worrisome thing, then he shot in the 60’s from the line his freshman year...So we talking bout a dude with a weird shot who can’t be counted on to do much of the dribble, get to the line and play the 1 all game, hmm sounds a lot like.....Lonzo, with less athleticism and size plus being a year older coming outHe's going to be playing off ball most likely wherever he goes. Not really a PG. C&S with deep range. Mechanics won't matter as much. 42% shooter from 3 on good volume and while he barely gets to the line at all, he's an 82% FT shooter when he does get there, so to me, that tells me he's a good shooter. The mechanics are weird, but the shots go in. C&S 3s, runners, and driving and kicking. Won't have the in-between game, but that shouldn't stop him from being an effective player.
Basically like a 3 and D wing with elite vision and high bball IQ. 6'5" with 6'8" wingspan.
Put him in Golden State, Atlanta, or Phoenix and he'll be an asset immediately.
Wait why are you saying he's playing the 1 all game when he's not going to be a PGI’m saying I don’t see where all the confidence in him being a legit “asset” is coming from...You been saying he will be better then Lonzo but Lonzo shot 40% from 3 in college as well and Haliburton’s ft% is on barely 2 attempts a game which is another worrisome thing, then he shot in the 60’s from the line his freshman year...So we talking bout a dude with a weird shot who can’t be counted on to do much of the dribble, get to the line and play the 1 all game, hmm sounds a lot like.....Lonzo, with less athleticism and size plus being a year older coming out
Playing PG all game was in my list of things he can’t doWait why are you saying he's playing the 1 all game when he's not going to be a PG
Reason why most mocks have him going to the Hawks. Perfect fit to play the 2 alongside Ice Tray.
Can't be trusted to make plays?
Here's him playing Kira Lewis who you guys like to gas up. Had 23/11/9 to Kira's 8/5/4. Looked like he made some plays.
Who else do you want in the draft instead that can be trusted to make plays? Obi Toppin?
Better in PnR and better floater. Doesn't play scared like Lonzo does. Trust his jumper more. Lonzo was a 67% FT shooter in college and has only been 49% in 3 years in the league. Haliburton is never going to get to the line much for you, but I think his jumper, albeit ugly form, is very real. 43% from 3 and 78% from the line in his 2 years at Iowa St.Rather have Kira, he can dribble and get in the paint ...I’m just pointing out that you been saying dude is gon be “better” than Lonzo but everything bout yo says the league just getting a watered down version with a quiet father ...I’m asking what makes you so confident? I can pull up good UCLA games of Ball as well
Better in PnR and better floater. Doesn't play scared like Lonzo does. Trust his jumper more. Lonzo was a 67% FT shooter in college and has only been 49% in 3 years in the league. Haliburton is never going to get to the line much for you, but I think his jumper, albeit ugly form, is very real. 43% from 3 and 78% from the line in his 2 years at Iowa St.
His passing and shooting are too elite to not help any team right away. The fact that he's a great team defender helps his case even more.
thats my brothers video. That’s my beat in the background
Sophomore with 7 foot wingspan, plays defense, shoots 50/50/80 on 23ppg.
How is Nesmith projected to go 11-15? Thats a top 10 pick.
He can’t dribbleSophomore with 7 foot wingspan, plays defense, shoots 50/50/80 on 23ppg.
How is Nesmith projected to go 11-15? Thats a top 10 pick.
The form is ugly looking, but Haliburton is going to be a knockdown C&S guy with range, that can also put the ball on the floor and hit runners or find the open man. Plays good team defense too. Will be the ultimate glue guy on a really good team. Not sure what more you could ask for if you aren't picking in the top 5 of this, or really any draft.
He's basically what everyone wants Lonzo to be. And that isn't bad.