- 3,251
- 70
- Joined
- Jun 27, 2005
how are people still arguing for 2? The answer is was and always will be 288...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
ncmalko1 wrote:
It is two.Why has no one proven that the first step is to do the ENTIRE paranthesis first.
2(9+3) MUST be solved completely first. Wow!
great question! i'm glad you asked...
answer: because the literature consistently states to perform the order of operations from left to right. furthermore, the literature states that the P in PEMDAS only includes things inside of the parenthesis.
you seem very passionate about this issue. please provide 3 legitimate sources that show what you're saying is correct.
hint: your 4th grade math teacher doesn't count.
something to think about--if you can't find 3 sources that agree with you, then maybe your thinking is incorrect. just because this is the way you were taught, does not mean it is the correct way to do the problem or deal with parentheses.
-waystinthyme
ncmalko1 wrote:
It is two.Why has no one proven that the first step is to do the ENTIRE paranthesis first.
2(9+3) MUST be solved completely first. Wow!
great question! i'm glad you asked...
answer: because the literature consistently states to perform the order of operations from left to right. furthermore, the literature states that the P in PEMDAS only includes things inside of the parenthesis.
you seem very passionate about this issue. please provide 3 legitimate sources that show what you're saying is correct.
hint: your 4th grade math teacher doesn't count.
something to think about--if you can't find 3 sources that agree with you, then maybe your thinking is incorrect. just because this is the way you were taught, does not mean it is the correct way to do the problem or deal with parentheses.
-waystinthyme
Originally Posted by THE SAUNA
how are people still arguing for 2? The answer is was and always will be 288...
Originally Posted by THE SAUNA
how are people still arguing for 2? The answer is was and always will be 288...
Originally Posted by do work son
if the problem said 48/2(9+3) it would be safe to assume that 48/2 was the coefficient to the term (9+3).
but the problem says 48÷2(9+3) implying that everything after the division sign is in the denominator, grouping 2 as the coefficient to (9+3)
Originally Posted by do work son
if the problem said 48/2(9+3) it would be safe to assume that 48/2 was the coefficient to the term (9+3).
but the problem says 48÷2(9+3) implying that everything after the division sign is in the denominator, grouping 2 as the coefficient to (9+3)
Originally Posted by usainboltisfast
Originally Posted by do work son
if the problem said 48/2(9+3) it would be safe to assume that 48/2 was the coefficient to the term (9+3).
but the problem says 48÷2(9+3) implying that everything after the division sign is in the denominator, grouping 2 as the coefficient to (9+3)
Source for your theory?
Originally Posted by usainboltisfast
Originally Posted by do work son
if the problem said 48/2(9+3) it would be safe to assume that 48/2 was the coefficient to the term (9+3).
but the problem says 48÷2(9+3) implying that everything after the division sign is in the denominator, grouping 2 as the coefficient to (9+3)
Source for your theory?