48÷2(9+3) = ???

[do work son]

Originally Posted by JMar 23

This thread is ridiculous.

Can we look at it like this?

48
_______

2(9+3)

team 288 is solving for a multiplication problem. the OG problem is a division problem though. team 288 keeps solving for 48/2 * (9+3) but that isn't how the problem is written. the problem is written as

48
_______    <--- that is what happens to your division sign

2(9+3)

 

[thehealthinspector]

Originally Posted by JPioneer

Please someone explain how the hell this is almost 100 pages long

Must be noodz hidden on some page.

its almost 100 pages because "team 2" people want to keep making up stuff based on "implications" instead of actual rules

÷... this division sign, yeah it implies separate numerators and denominators for the entire equation because somehow its different from "/"

2(9+3) ... this 2 without the multiplication sign, yeah it implies one single term through distribution just because it LACKS the multiplication symbol

 

[yungchris504]

Originally Posted by do work son

Originally Posted by JMar 23

This thread is ridiculous.

Can we look at it like this?

48
_______

2(9+3)

team 288 is solving for a multiplication problem. the OG problem is a division problem though. team 288 keeps solving for 48/2 * (9+3) but that isn't how the problem is written. the problem is written as

48
_______    <--- that is what happens to your division sign

2(9+3)

Exactly

 

[thehealthinspector]

Originally Posted by JPioneer

Please someone explain how the hell this is almost 100 pages long

Must be noodz hidden on some page.

its almost 100 pages because "team 2" people want to keep making up stuff based on "implications" instead of actual rules

÷... this division sign, yeah it implies separate numerators and denominators for the entire equation because somehow its different from "/"

2(9+3) ... this 2 without the multiplication sign, yeah it implies one single term through distribution just because it LACKS the multiplication symbol

 

[yungchris504]

Originally Posted by do work son

Originally Posted by JMar 23

This thread is ridiculous.

Can we look at it like this?

48
_______

2(9+3)

team 288 is solving for a multiplication problem. the OG problem is a division problem though. team 288 keeps solving for 48/2 * (9+3) but that isn't how the problem is written. the problem is written as

48
_______    <--- that is what happens to your division sign

2(9+3)

Exactly

 

[usainboltisfast]

Originally Posted by do work son

Originally Posted by JMar 23

This thread is ridiculous.

Can we look at it like this?

48
_______

2(9+3)

team 288 is solving for a multiplication problem. the OG problem is a division problem though. team 288 keeps solving for 48/2 * (9+3) but that isn't how the problem is written. the problem is written as

48
_______    <--- that is what happens to your division sign

2(9+3)

Son i write equations all day for computer programming and if you were to do that you NEED another set of parenthesis. Please explain why 48/(2(9+3)) works on ANY MODERN calculator and gets 2 but the way its written in the thread gets 288?

 

[limitedretroog]

Originally Posted by do work son

Originally Posted by JMar 23

This thread is ridiculous.



Can we look at it like this?



48

_______



2(9+3)

team 288 is solving for a multiplication problem. the OG problem is a division problem though. team 288 keeps solving for 48/2 * (9+3) but that isn't how the problem is written. the problem is written as

48

_______    <--- that is what happens to your division sign


2(9+3)

Dude, your problem and the problem in the OP are TWO COMPLETELY DIFFERENT PROBLEMS.

 

[limitedretroog]

Originally Posted by do work son

Originally Posted by JMar 23

This thread is ridiculous.



Can we look at it like this?



48

_______



2(9+3)

team 288 is solving for a multiplication problem. the OG problem is a division problem though. team 288 keeps solving for 48/2 * (9+3) but that isn't how the problem is written. the problem is written as

48

_______    <--- that is what happens to your division sign


2(9+3)

Dude, your problem and the problem in the OP are TWO COMPLETELY DIFFERENT PROBLEMS.

 

[usainboltisfast]

Originally Posted by do work son

Originally Posted by JMar 23

This thread is ridiculous.

Can we look at it like this?

48
_______

2(9+3)

team 288 is solving for a multiplication problem. the OG problem is a division problem though. team 288 keeps solving for 48/2 * (9+3) but that isn't how the problem is written. the problem is written as

48
_______    <--- that is what happens to your division sign

2(9+3)

Son i write equations all day for computer programming and if you were to do that you NEED another set of parenthesis. Please explain why 48/(2(9+3)) works on ANY MODERN calculator and gets 2 but the way its written in the thread gets 288?

 

[snakeyes17]

Originally Posted by usainboltisfast

Originally Posted by do work son

Originally Posted by JMar 23

This thread is ridiculous.

Can we look at it like this?

48
_______

2(9+3)

team 288 is solving for a multiplication problem. the OG problem is a division problem though. team 288 keeps solving for 48/2 * (9+3) but that isn't how the problem is written. the problem is written as

48
_______    <--- that is what happens to your division sign

2(9+3)

Son i write equations all day for computer programming and if you were to do that you NEED another set of parenthesis. Please explain why 48/(2(9+3)) works on ANY MODERN calculator and gets 2 but the way its written in the thread gets 288?

Exactly.
How in the world can you call the original problem a division problem? It has division, addition, multiplication....
Anyone knows that dividing by 2 is the same as multiplying by .5
48 times . 5 times 12 = 288.

 

[snakeyes17]

Originally Posted by usainboltisfast

Originally Posted by do work son

Originally Posted by JMar 23

This thread is ridiculous.

Can we look at it like this?

48
_______

2(9+3)

team 288 is solving for a multiplication problem. the OG problem is a division problem though. team 288 keeps solving for 48/2 * (9+3) but that isn't how the problem is written. the problem is written as

48
_______    <--- that is what happens to your division sign

2(9+3)

Son i write equations all day for computer programming and if you were to do that you NEED another set of parenthesis. Please explain why 48/(2(9+3)) works on ANY MODERN calculator and gets 2 but the way its written in the thread gets 288?

Exactly.
How in the world can you call the original problem a division problem? It has division, addition, multiplication....
Anyone knows that dividing by 2 is the same as multiplying by .5
48 times . 5 times 12 = 288.

 

[mo greene]

Originally Posted by do work son

Originally Posted by JMar 23

This thread is ridiculous.

Can we look at it like this?

48
_______

2(9+3)

team 288 is solving for a multiplication problem. the OG problem is a division problem though. team 288 keeps solving for 48/2 * (9+3) but that isn't how the problem is written. the problem is written as

48
_______    <--- that is what happens to your division sign

2(9+3)

i still can't believe you think there's a difference between Ã· and /

 

[do work son]

if you have 48/2(9+3) you're assuming it's a multiplication problem of 48/2 and (9+3). it isn't though. if you can't see that this is a division problem, then there isn't any sense in continuing to argue with you

 

[do work son]

if you have 48/2(9+3) you're assuming it's a multiplication problem of 48/2 and (9+3). it isn't though. if you can't see that this is a division problem, then there isn't any sense in continuing to argue with you

 

[mo greene]

Originally Posted by do work son

Originally Posted by JMar 23

This thread is ridiculous.

Can we look at it like this?

48
_______

2(9+3)

team 288 is solving for a multiplication problem. the OG problem is a division problem though. team 288 keeps solving for 48/2 * (9+3) but that isn't how the problem is written. the problem is written as

48
_______    <--- that is what happens to your division sign

2(9+3)

i still can't believe you think there's a difference between Ã· and /

 

[jchambers]

do work son wrote:

---

Originally Posted by JMar 23

This thread is ridiculous.

Can we look at it like this?

48
_______

2(9+3)

team 288 is solving for a multiplication problem. the OG problem is a division problem though. team 288 keeps solving for 48/2 * (9+3) but that isn't how the problem is written. the problem is written as

48
_______    <--- that is what happens to your division sign

2(9+3)

   The hell are you talking about? The problem is written as:  48÷2(9+3)   

 

[jchambers]

do work son wrote:

---

Originally Posted by JMar 23

This thread is ridiculous.

Can we look at it like this?

48
_______

2(9+3)

team 288 is solving for a multiplication problem. the OG problem is a division problem though. team 288 keeps solving for 48/2 * (9+3) but that isn't how the problem is written. the problem is written as

48
_______    <--- that is what happens to your division sign

2(9+3)

   The hell are you talking about? The problem is written as:  48÷2(9+3)   

 

[limitedretroog]

Is that it? Done? RIP for Team 2?

 

[limitedretroog]

Is that it? Done? RIP for Team 2?

 

[thehealthinspector]

Originally Posted by do work son

if you have 48/2(9+3) you're assuming it's a multiplication problem of 48/2 and (9+3). it isn't though. if you can't see that this is a division problem, then there isn't any sense in continuing to argue with you

are "X" and "*" different?  even though its impossible to use them differently when writing an equation?

 

[dimeslikehefner]

100+ 

 

[thehealthinspector]

Originally Posted by do work son

if you have 48/2(9+3) you're assuming it's a multiplication problem of 48/2 and (9+3). it isn't though. if you can't see that this is a division problem, then there isn't any sense in continuing to argue with you

are "X" and "*" different?  even though its impossible to use them differently when writing an equation?

 

[dimeslikehefner]

100+ 

 

[jchambers]

Originally Posted by TheHealthInspector

Originally Posted by do work son

if you have 48/2(9+3) you're assuming it's a multiplication problem of 48/2 and (9+3). it isn't though. if you can't see that this is a division problem, then there isn't any sense in continuing to argue with you

are "X" and "*" different?  even though its impossible to use them differently when writing an equation?

 

[sbrar8]

I dont get it, what's the debate?

the answer is clearly 288

NT is full of ******s