48÷2(9+3) = ???

Originally Posted by OGbobbyjohnson773

48÷2(9+3) wrote:
Well, my girlfriend says she cant figure me out either. FML.





laugh.gif
laugh.gif
...
roll.gif
roll.gif
roll.gif
roll.gif
roll.gif



...
 
Originally Posted by MECKS

CertifiedSW wrote:
Originally Posted by Klipschorn


http://www.purplemath.com/modules/orderops.htm



http://www.math.com/school/subject2/lessons/S2U1L2GL.html


[font=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif][size=-1][/size][/font]


http://mathforum.org/dr.math/faq/faq.order.operations.html


Besides the obvious sources Google and Wolfram.. THUS 288.
pimp.gif
pimp.gif
pimp.gif

Finally someone with some common sense. Good post. 


distributive property of multiplication








Again, you multiplied before you divide.  WRONG.  my "info" still stands.  Cite some legitimate sources that proves me wrong otherwise. You're suppose to evaluate left to right as there are division and multiplication present because they're of the same rank.

Originally Posted by kingcrux31

Originally Posted by usainboltisfast

Originally Posted by kingcrux31

That's a different problem from what was posted and doesn't include division. Here, answer this quick in your head 50÷2(1-1) =???
[font=arial, sans-serif]
[/font]

[font=arial, sans-serif]Don't tell me your answer is 25 or 0 because if so 
laugh.gif
[/font]

[font=arial, sans-serif]
[/font]
50/2(1-1)
50/2(0)
25(0)

0

Its so disgusting that your a mod. You wont even admit you dont even know how to use the distributive property. Admit you were wrong trying to distribute in this problem.
The answer is UNDEFINED. 
eyes.gif
LOL!







At this point, i'm assuming TEAM 2 don't trust google (wolfram, bing, any search giant) or TI calculators anymore because it can't perform simple arithmetic problem(s)?
 
Originally Posted by MECKS

CertifiedSW wrote:
Originally Posted by Klipschorn


http://www.purplemath.com/modules/orderops.htm



http://www.math.com/school/subject2/lessons/S2U1L2GL.html


[font=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif][size=-1][/size][/font]


http://mathforum.org/dr.math/faq/faq.order.operations.html


Besides the obvious sources Google and Wolfram.. THUS 288.
pimp.gif
pimp.gif
pimp.gif

Finally someone with some common sense. Good post. 


distributive property of multiplication








Again, you multiplied before you divide.  WRONG.  my "info" still stands.  Cite some legitimate sources that proves me wrong otherwise. You're suppose to evaluate left to right as there are division and multiplication present because they're of the same rank.

Originally Posted by kingcrux31

Originally Posted by usainboltisfast

Originally Posted by kingcrux31

That's a different problem from what was posted and doesn't include division. Here, answer this quick in your head 50÷2(1-1) =???
[font=arial, sans-serif]
[/font]

[font=arial, sans-serif]Don't tell me your answer is 25 or 0 because if so 
laugh.gif
[/font]

[font=arial, sans-serif]
[/font]
50/2(1-1)
50/2(0)
25(0)

0

Its so disgusting that your a mod. You wont even admit you dont even know how to use the distributive property. Admit you were wrong trying to distribute in this problem.
The answer is UNDEFINED. 
eyes.gif
LOL!







At this point, i'm assuming TEAM 2 don't trust google (wolfram, bing, any search giant) or TI calculators anymore because it can't perform simple arithmetic problem(s)?
 
Originally Posted by UnkleTomCruze

Originally Posted by balloonoboy

How is 2 an afterthought when the only way there is a 2 outside the parenthesis is because there was originally a 2 inside.



Don't ever call me obtuse in your life, lil $$%@!. Tryna use big words and !$!!. ###% outta here.


2my3a1.gif



laugh.gif
laugh.gif


...


roll.gif
roll.gif
the anger

Originally Posted by OGbobbyjohnson773

48÷2(9+3) wrote:
They say Chinese people are good at math. Yeah, so what. Theyre too fast, I want some foreplay. I love Americans, they take their time with me.





LOLWUT
 
Originally Posted by UnkleTomCruze

Originally Posted by balloonoboy

How is 2 an afterthought when the only way there is a 2 outside the parenthesis is because there was originally a 2 inside.



Don't ever call me obtuse in your life, lil $$%@!. Tryna use big words and !$!!. ###% outta here.


2my3a1.gif



laugh.gif
laugh.gif


...


roll.gif
roll.gif
the anger

Originally Posted by OGbobbyjohnson773

48÷2(9+3) wrote:
They say Chinese people are good at math. Yeah, so what. Theyre too fast, I want some foreplay. I love Americans, they take their time with me.





LOLWUT
 
Originally Posted by balloonoboy

OG
laugh.gif


And distribution always applies, nimrods.

That is correct. I believe if the dude did not want to imply this he would have placed a multiplication sign in front of the parenthesis.
The distribution rule states

X(a+b) = (Xa + Xb) = (Xa) + (Xb)

it does not say 

X*(a+b) = (Xa + Xb) = (Xa) + (Xb)

 
Originally Posted by balloonoboy

OG
laugh.gif


And distribution always applies, nimrods.

That is correct. I believe if the dude did not want to imply this he would have placed a multiplication sign in front of the parenthesis.
The distribution rule states

X(a+b) = (Xa + Xb) = (Xa) + (Xb)

it does not say 

X*(a+b) = (Xa + Xb) = (Xa) + (Xb)

 
Back
Top Bottom