- 21
- 10
- Joined
- Apr 29, 2008
SOOO clean i want these
'94 AJIII Retro's .......Oops>good lookin ;-)
- Thread in 'Jordan Brand' Thread starter Started by retrourfeet,
- Start date
- 729
- 10
- Joined
- May 18, 2008
- 1,880
- 11
- Joined
- Jun 14, 2006
Amen to that! Plus the elephant prints @ the toe box on the '88 III's are very fine compared to the '94 III's which are so broad.Yup, it's not worth buying the item... It's too much...Originally Posted by Joerdan23
Originally Posted by retrourfeet
Thats the thing theyre not retro 94'sTheyre the Orig. AJIII's
Your 100% wrong on that my friend. Check the tagging your shoes have the date they were made right on them, 940406.
Those are most def 94 retros.
These are Originals, and the Original Box.
Tagging is different, the toe box cement is not as thick, cement print is original not the very thick lined cement we now currently have, leather is much better (oh so buttery) and it would be damn near impossible to find an original pair with no yellowing and a clear bubble from 1988.
- 9,530
- 91
- Joined
- Dec 17, 2003
- 612
- 12
- Joined
- Apr 15, 2008
220 tops wit me but im stubborn wit the cash!
- 130
- 10
- Joined
- Nov 29, 2005
sholly
- 338
- 10
- Joined
- Oct 27, 2006
nice looking shoes
- 17,790
- 834
- Joined
- Mar 16, 2008
lolOriginally Posted by northparkblind
Shut up.
obviously your just a Retro head.
guess more pairs for me then.
- 400
- 17
- Joined
- Mar 20, 2007
Yea This is Lame!!!!!! Stop trying to sell here use the buy sell fourm
- 860
- 10
- Joined
- Jan 22, 2008
thats what i was thinking my man
- 19
- 10
- Joined
- Dec 22, 2007
co-sign
- 660
- 10
- Joined
- Apr 20, 2007
not for no 1300 lol...
- 2,125
- 108
- Joined
- Sep 29, 2006
who said 94 is originals, wake up.
- 5,790
- 1,193
- Joined
- Oct 28, 2007
Originally Posted by retrourfeet
Read til the bottom of last pic
>for those that keep saying retro 94's
-Sorry guys couldnt help it, still got luv
hows that foot taste?
- 555
- 10
- Joined
- Nov 9, 2003
kinda. the elephant print and prob the leather but that was your opinion
- 1,476
- 233
- Joined
- Jun 29, 2000
Not sure how much they are worth, but I'm sure you can get a lot more for them that what it says in that price guide.
w3stchicago
Banned
- 606
- 10
- Joined
- Oct 3, 2008
if you had that kind of money to spare id get em.
- 464
- 482
- Joined
- Apr 5, 2008
damn I remeber wen I had those
taggpoppernj
Banned
- 1,084
- 10
- Joined
- Apr 4, 2008
Wow are you serious? Over a G for og 3's?? Nah homie, not that serious plus why pay so much for a shoe you can't even wear?? As good as they look aftera few wears they gonna turn into dust.
- 108
- 10
- Joined
- Jun 20, 2008
i personally hate the fact that my 3's have yellowed. =/ ive got a pair of white 2001 DS and tried everything i could to keep them from yellowing. somepeople dig the yellow but i dunno...
- 110
- 10
- Joined
- Aug 2, 2008
over priced by a mile!!
- 49
- 10
- Joined
- May 25, 2007
wow i'd never pay that much. they're worth a lot tho. less than 8 i'd say
- 8,942
- 5,398
- Joined
- Sep 7, 2005
Originally Posted by retrourfeet
Thats the thing theyre not retro 94'sTheyre the Orig. AJIII's
quoted for lack of knowledge. Son got schooled.
- 8,942
- 5,398
- Joined
- Sep 7, 2005
FIRST B0RN wrote:Originally Posted by 1OAKLAND ZUU
Originally Posted by northparkblind
Shut up.
obviously your just a Retro head.
Your a retro hater u sap. It's cool though you wouldn't tell me to shut up in real life.
- 65
- 10
- Joined
- Aug 15, 2005
oh damn so clean!