- 3,155
- 1,560
- Joined
- Oct 19, 2012
Agreed. This doesn't happen when i wear my chalks, also tried on 2.0 whites and they were fine as well. I wore my silvers recently and my right shoe started to bother me within 10 minutes.
Last edited:
ADIDAS BOOST Thread - PAGE 1 for INFO- *NO BUYING/SELLING/TRADING*
- Thread in 'Other Brands' Thread starter Started by jpac,
- Start date
- 10
- 22
- Joined
- Mar 31, 2015
For anyone who still can't decide on these. Gradients are clear, 1.0 still better imo.
Last edited:
- 236
- 57
- Joined
- Aug 24, 2015
i reckon the gradients have a slimming/ lengthening effect on the foot. a real boon for chunky feet..
- 942
- 546
- Joined
- Feb 4, 2016
I go no insole on all my UBs for this reason. It's definitely not a size issue as I have plenty of room at the toe. Some people just have a taller instep, and if you add in feet that are wide, it makes it even worse. I have had this problem before with other shoes that feature a sock opening since you can't adjust it for fit like a traditional tongue design.
- 3,229
- 193
- Joined
- Jan 30, 2008
Same, just took out the insole and wear no show socks with all my ultraboost. problem solved.
- 530
- 145
- Joined
- Mar 23, 2016
Last edited:
- 216
- 55
- Joined
- Jun 25, 2014
Definitely not just you - it is TERRIBLE no matter the device
- 5,234
- 4,877
- Joined
- Jul 24, 2013
UB 2.0 in stores. disappointing imo...
- 216
- 55
- Joined
- Jun 25, 2014
hard pass
- 1,168
- 529
- Joined
- Jan 11, 2016
Definitely 1.0 > 2.0. Except for outsole losing out
You need to go to the doctor. Never had that happen.
Last edited:
- 2,877
- 546
- Joined
- Feb 14, 2014
- 289
- 33
- Joined
- Dec 21, 2014
Copped last pair of 8.5 all white ub 2.0's from champs in NYC. They look really nice on feet! I like em
- 3,155
- 1,560
- Joined
- Oct 19, 2012
125th or 42nd st?
- 289
- 33
- Joined
- Dec 21, 2014
42nd. They had larger sizes I think too? Like 10. I'd call ahead
- 40,667
- 46,348
- Joined
- Feb 2, 2008
What's so disappointing about the 2.0 TWs?
- 812
- 332
- Joined
- Feb 29, 2016
Are those core blacks or 3Ms? kinda look like the 3M upper from this angle. I Hope they're not 3Ms. Cause you may want to look at a refund. Couple things are throwing me off haha
thanks!!!
I prefer 1.0
This is today
New Womens ultra boost on bait. http://www.baitme.com/adidas-women-ultraboost-black-core-black-shock-purple-adaq5935-55
- 1,171
- 688
- Joined
- Apr 1, 2014
people always just need something to ***** about....OR the 1.0s were THAT incredible which has lead to the whine fest? I dunno I think they look great.
- 2,168
- 1,128
- Joined
- Dec 4, 2015
These are the first pics I've seen that properly show the knitting detail on the toe. Looks good.
- 5,234
- 4,877
- Joined
- Jul 24, 2013
99% of us don't like the gradient pattern. that's why gradient UB are sitting on your local shelf and solid patterning is sold out
- 5,234
- 4,877
- Joined
- Jul 24, 2013
i don't think its that at all (people just finding something to complain about)
you can't call a shoe "all white" and then throw some grey streaks on them.
we were just expecting a better version of the triple white UB (not even sure how you could even make the UB 1 better).
- 40,667
- 46,348
- Joined
- Feb 2, 2008
Im not a huge fan of the gradient either, but the pic you posted looked nice imo. Gradient isnt too contrasting
- 5,850
- 2,770
- Joined
- Feb 15, 2016
Make a better outsole. Nubs are water-challenged. And continental soles squeak like you are in the NBA playoffs.
- 5,234
- 4,877
- Joined
- Jul 24, 2013
when you see them in person, you'll change your mind. gradient pattern is very visible and out of place, imo
