- 33,891
- 39,740
- Joined
- Jul 18, 2012
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Why they shaped like that. These for fat footers? That opening is girthy.
It's like looking back at an old picture "what the eff was I thinking" these did not age well.
Y'all still gonna try to buy it though
one of the ugliest yeezys ever. they make 350 v2s look like waverunners
Its not like theyre sock runners. I mean as in they’re more or less structureless shoe. They’ll fall on your foot according to your sizing. just saying i wouldnt obsess over the of foot silhouette that muchIve had all the V1’s cept these and I woudnt say they conform to your foot.
So what’s the sizing on V1’s? Let’s say imA 9 in V2’s… 8.5 on these?
V1's have aged terribly. Should've adopted the V1 classics over to the V2 model.
The purist would prob lose their mindV1's have aged terribly. Should've adopted the V1 classics over to the V2 model.
Give me a moonrock colorway on a midsole that doesn’t crack after one wear.V1's have aged terribly. Should've adopted the V1 classics over to the V2 model.
I'd still buy 750 seeing as how I don't own a pair. V1's definitely aged bad but retail hit is a retail hit. But let's be real, adidas/confirmed/ys hate me so probably won't be picking up TDsIf V1s drop we might see 750s at some point but at 350 idk how they would sell