- Aug 9, 2012
- 90
- 19
Wow, good pick up
AGAIN?? Nike Trainer SC High Retro - Spring 2013
- Thread in 'Nike Retro' Thread starter Started by deewlay,
- Start date
- Dec 27, 2012
- 61
- 11
- Mar 17, 2011
- 1,570
- 915
Last edited:
- Feb 29, 2000
- 88,814
- 48,078
those are gs
- Jun 23, 2009
- 42,972
- 43,688
- Oct 7, 2012
- 358
- 304
Man Those retros look gooddddd.... I have the 09s but I will buy those too.
- Oct 7, 2012
- 358
- 304
RELEASE DATE ANYONE???? These are so tough... Wowwwww
- Oct 15, 2012
- 2,616
- 4,855
these are out now...
- Oct 7, 2012
- 358
- 304
thankyou for that information
- Oct 15, 2012
- 2,616
- 4,855
Just Got In....
- Sep 30, 2006
- 15,825
- 12,231
^Dam didnt know they had 3m, do all of em have 3m? including the auburns?
- Oct 15, 2012
- 2,616
- 4,855
Only these so far bro...and the fact that I got these for 55 bucks makes it so much sweeter
- Feb 23, 2013
- 29
- 13
i got a pair of these & am a fan..but i didnt think they needed to be retro again so soon
- Jul 21, 2012
- 38
- 10
idk why but i love this shoe. the pair i have now is a little beat up so i need a new pair
- Jan 12, 2013
- 279
- 94
Got Auburns for about $85 with employee discount. Yes, the leather quality is pretty bad, but it's such a classic colorway.
- Jan 23, 2013
- 14
- 10
Picked up a pair because Bo Jackson was signing autographs here last weekend. Will post pics of the signed shoe.
I have now bought the Auburns every time they have released (including the 2010 version).
I have now bought the Auburns every time they have released (including the 2010 version).
- Jul 12, 2011
- 893
- 89
I dig the auburns , but for the time being, im cool with my raiders. Maybe later on I can catch em on clearance , and get em for $55 shipped , becuase honestly , thats about all theyre worth quality wise lol . Still comfy though 
- Sep 30, 2000
- 99
- 15
Leather quality is bad??? Please give us more details.
My pair looks exactly like I would expect them to look.
My pair looks exactly like I would expect them to look.
- Mar 20, 2001
- 3,875
- 2,017
I think that's it in a nutshell. It's "bad" in relation to what many may remember as the good stuff from years ago. For right now, it's pretty much on par w/ the kind of leather Nike puts out on retros and you come to expect it. What I never expect is when they give really good, thick, supple leather to something like the SC IIs.
If you're buying these to wear, you're fine (IMO). If buying cheap leather annoys you, but you still want a pair strictly to wear, wait for'em to go on sale.
Last edited:
- Nov 5, 2003
- 2,277
- 3,200
Guess not that many people cares the all black one that came out in Europe recently w/ the QS tag since no one has really mentioning about that pair on this thread. Hope it means that pair would basically be available for some kind of sale price though.
- Aug 18, 2012
- 8,560
- 3,537
I saw the black QS but I ain't feelin them...
- Mar 17, 2011
- 1,570
- 915
2013 Q.S.'s
- Feb 17, 2006
- 5,296
- 11,856
That patent leather toe cap kilt them in a bad way. These looked great until that.2013 Q.S.'s
Smh
- Mar 20, 2001
- 3,875
- 2,017
Agreed. They're fine til you view that one piece.
- Mar 17, 2011
- 1,570
- 915
i agree with you both^^ i would of bought them if it wasn't for that!
