- 9,381
- 11,580
- Joined
- Aug 15, 2009
yeah quality wise, theyre neck in neck with the 94s. actually, I have 85 Royal Blues, 94 Chicagos, and Banned 1s and each one of them has a different leather. The 85s leather is rock solid, the 94s leather is softer but still durable, and the Banneds leather is soft crinkled leather and has more give.Originally Posted by DJ Proto J
Originally Posted by sthebest
agreed, these shame the 01. theyre neck in neck with the 94s in my opinion.Originally Posted by ColdCity
these are better than the 01's in my opinion
cosign on banneds being better than '01's, as i own both and can see it for myself. but you really compared the leather on '94 1's and they're neck and neck with these? that's interesting. the leather on these banneds is premium as hell compared to most jordans i've seen since the 90's...
i wouldn't know how to compare these vs. my 1985 black toes. i'd just say the leather on the banneds is more "grainy" and soft, probably.