- 7,139
- 1,708
- Joined
- Jan 2, 2012
Air Jordan 1 High “Black Toe” – 2013 NO buying,selling-trading
- Thread in 'Jordan Brand' Thread starter Started by coldcity,
- Start date
- 16,421
- 2,164
- Joined
- Feb 15, 2012
^Would try and cop if I could 
Wore the real royals clothes shopping yesterday. A sneakerhead asked me if they could feel the tongue
a few ladies said they liked the shoes. All was good.
Favorite white based 1s. These black toes must be had. Preordering first chance I get under $250
Wore the real royals clothes shopping yesterday. A sneakerhead asked me if they could feel the tongue
a few ladies said they liked the shoes. All was good. Favorite white based 1s. These black toes must be had. Preordering first chance I get under $250
Last edited:
- 6,384
- 1,053
- Joined
- Jul 21, 2012
The OG White/Blues. Never seen them with a black swoosh
![air-jordan-og-1-white-blue.jpg[IMG]]()
![air-jordan-og-1-white-blue.jpg[IMG]](/proxy.php?image=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.sneakerfiles.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2008%2F05%2Fair-jordan-og-1-white-blue.jpg%5BIMG%5D&hash=51681e0d15d938d4a0c4d5c24b7acd94)
- 690
- 61
- Joined
- Sep 4, 2012
Is there a release date confirmed?
- 2,477
- 588
- Joined
- Dec 27, 2011
already released but not og treatment. don't think they are releasing w/ og treatment.
http://www.flightclubny.com/p.php?fc=ny&c=new&i=011682
fc already has them up, also ebayers..
Last edited:
- 55,398
- 62,957
- Joined
- May 15, 2003
Are you color blind Those are the Carolina ones, entirely different shade of blue.
Those OG navy blue ones
Those are the Carolina ones, entirely different shade of blue.Those OG navy blue ones
- 8,064
- 5,274
- Joined
- Dec 25, 2006
def not carolina blue on that shirtAre you color blind
Those OG navy blue ones
- 10,933
- 4,861
- Joined
- Dec 4, 2005
AFTER THE ROYALS RELEASE, PEOPLE WON'T SLEEP ON THESE LIKE THEY DID THE ROYALS, THINKING THEY WOULD BE ANY EASY COP. LUCKILY, THESE ARE JUST EHHH TO ME. I HAVE ROYALS AND BREDS WHICH IS WHAT I WANTED SO IF I DON'T GET THESE I'LL BE OK.
- 3,461
- 7,537
- Joined
- Aug 9, 2012
These were never gonna get slept on but you're right though the royals fiasco didn't make these any easier to cop. I was most excited about these out of all the 1s this year since they've never really been retrod (I don't count those jumpman mids from the bmp). After getting the royals though, they're gonna be tough to beat.
- 7,472
- 2,744
- Joined
- Jun 21, 2010
Those are dope!
Especially the Blue/White color way.
I would buy a pair of "Royal Toes", Toe in Royal and Red is replaced with Black. That would be dope. Can anyone Photoshop what I'm describing? My PS skills are amateur.
Last edited:
- 6,384
- 1,053
- Joined
- Jul 21, 2012
No, another guy posted a link to the UNC 1s that released not too long agodef not carolina blue on that shirtAre you color blindThose are the Carolina ones, entirely different shade of blue.
Those OG navy blue ones
- 80
- 37
- Joined
- Dec 26, 2012
Fuego. I had to say no to these for the OG Bred 1s in November...shoe problems.
- 348
- 115
- Joined
- Dec 23, 2012
Bred 1s aren't confirmed yet. But I'd love it when it is. Year of the 1s for me if that's the case.
- 6,384
- 1,053
- Joined
- Jul 21, 2012
2009 was the year of the 1s
Breds, lakers, white/green, white purple, white/red(those 3 white/metallic colors havent come out since 1985) shadows, and i think there was another pair.
This is just a time where they are retroing the 1s.
Its the year of the 5s
As far as the bred 1s, that was simply a rumor. As far as I know, the banneds were the breds. Since all these 1s are coming with NA. If they were to release it would be with a jumpman. They wouldnt put it out with NA twice.
- 2,477
- 588
- Joined
- Dec 27, 2011
There is sense in it. Getting a plain Nike air box, na on the tongue but no X on the back. Plus not as great materials as the banned 1s, but like the royals. Makes sense, Nike saw how much people were paying for aj1 breds, why not capitalize. Probably expect the same #s as royals but with a lot more hype behind it. I'm already worried of striking out. Had lots of friends that passed on the royals but said they are in if it breds. Already expecting the worst.
- 496
- 72
- Joined
- Mar 2, 2010
didnt want these until i saw dude with the aj ko's then i thought wow these are way closer to original form....i want in goodluck to everyone who wants a pair
- 496
- 72
- Joined
- Mar 2, 2010
they come with 2 sets of laces right?
airthompson
Staff member
- 13,754
- 9,386
- Joined
- Jul 30, 2008
He's implying its the year of the 1's for himself. I hear you big dog, cuz that's all I'm copping this year too.
The Banneds may represent the b/reds. But its not entirely factual since they didnt release worldwide, and was a scrapped project. They were rumored to have an official release months after the outlet fiasco, but it never happened.
airthompson
Staff member
- 13,754
- 9,386
- Joined
- Jul 30, 2008
Royals did, Knicks didnt, so we'll have to wait and see. Would make sense to have em come with the red set too, cuz the OGs had both.
- 8,560
- 3,537
- Joined
- Aug 18, 2012
Royal (NA), Black/grey (NA?!), Black Toe (NA), Chicago, Bred (maybe), Knicks (NA), UNC, Hoyas, Celtic (NA) etc...etc... This is a better year for the 1s than the 5s imo...
- 496
- 72
- Joined
- Mar 2, 2010
thanks
- 668
- 71
- Joined
- Jan 3, 2013
not much competition since there are only 3 good colorways of 5s (arguably 2)
UNC are under rated .. ill get some on sale ... the soft greys are gonna be nice i bet ... breds will be nice
i sold my knicks and chicagos and dont really regret it, they need to use better quality white leather then i woulda kept the chicagos .. im in for black toes tho if my footlocker rewards are here by then LOL
- 348
- 115
- Joined
- Dec 23, 2012
Year of the 1s for me.
Anyway, DMP 1s have the Jumpman logo and banned 1s aren't exactly like the OG because of the 'x' and stuff but it was the closest.
If they are gonna release the Bred 1s again, I'm assuming they would stick to the OG box and OG treatment like the Royals and possibly the Black Toes.
- 6,384
- 1,053
- Joined
- Jul 21, 2012
I know what you're saying. The "Year of the..." label comes from it being the 23rd anniversary of that particular sig. This year is the 5s, so you see a few 5s coming about. (Metallic fire reds/ Laneys/ Black tongue fire reds / possible black metallics, grapes, ect.) Just because it is the year of the 5 does not mean multiple colorways of a certain retro cannot be released. Last year as an example, year of the 4, yet two pairs of 6s, a bunch of 10s, ect. And same thing is happening this year, a bunch of 1s, and a few 8s.
The year of the... label basically means that you will see retros of that shoes throughout the year, and the possibility of a 23rd anniversary shoe release.
The year of the... label basically means that you will see retros of that shoes throughout the year, and the possibility of a 23rd anniversary shoe release.
- 6,384
- 1,053
- Joined
- Jul 21, 2012
GotchaYear of the 1s for me.
Anyway, DMP 1s have the Jumpman logo and banned 1s aren't exactly like the OG because of the 'x' and stuff but it was the closest.
If they are gonna release the Bred 1s again, I'm assuming they would stick to the OG box and OG treatment like the Royals and possibly the Black Toes.
