- 39,147
- 40,425
- Joined
- Feb 5, 2013
well maybe not after the royal release.GR?
I dont think it means what you think it means.......
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
well maybe not after the royal release.GR?
I dont think it means what you think it means.......
By far it is better. I mean the quality on the OG branded 1's were superb. I was very impressed with the Knicks and especially the celtics 1's too but JB was on some other ish back in '09 with that quality. I kinda want another pair of '09's now...
I concur. Looks awful. Big reason I passed on a ton of 1s. Shadows are just so buttery tho. I'll do a comparison of both when I cop these.jumpman on the heel and better quality or a little worse quality and blank heel and nike air? yeah give me the blank heel, now if the 09s had a blank heel and a jumpman id get those but that stupid jumpman on the heel drives me nuts. Its so out of place and stupid looking on the 1s
I'm ready for the OG treatment on these but even with the jump man on the heel and tongue these were still great. Lets not act like we don't have any Air Jordan 1's with a jump man on the heel guys...
and they look horrible in my opinion, especially that jumpman on the heel which looks horrible especially in the color they made it.
View media item 379292Shadow kind of day out here in LA
i hear ya, i keep my sb griptapes in rotationSick shadows up there dude. To me black and grey sneakers look so clean.
ive only recently (2010) started to really like the 1 and its not only OGs that i like but most colorways look like crap and no i dont own a pair with the jumpman on the heel, KOs (no jumpman) celtics, 01 royals and my 2012 chicagos (i removed the jumpman from the heel myself) if they released more team colors without the jumpman on the heel i would cop more but still wouldnt cop those atrocious things up there even if they had OG quality leather, just not gunna happenSo you only own OG 1s? You don't have 1 pair in your collection with a Jumpman logo on the heel? All your 1s are from 85, 94, and 01 correct? Add in the Banneds as well since they don't have the logo on the heel. Serious question ...
ive only recently (2010) started to really like the 1 and its not only OGs that i like but most colorways look like crap and no i dont own a pair with the jumpman on the heel, KOs (no jumpman) celtics, 01 royals and my 2012 chicagos (i removed the jumpman from the heel myself) if they released more team colors without the jumpman on the heel i would cop more but still wouldnt cop those atrocious things up there even if they had OG quality leather, just not gunna happenSo you only own OG 1s? You don't have 1 pair in your collection with a Jumpman logo on the heel? All your 1s are from 85, 94, and 01 correct? Add in the Banneds as well since they don't have the logo on the heel. Serious question ...
I almost copped Celtics 1s below retail on the strength of that. Nike Air plus a blank heel is a win to me. I'd rather spend that kind of bread on a pair of SBs tho. If those ever hit outlets for like $80, I may cave.yeah not many like the celtics, for some reason they drew me in but i havent liked the one until i saw them without the jumpman on the heel, that might be why im copping more than usual only because i never liked them until the heel was blank so now the doors have opened for me on 1s, now the nike air tag i dont care about i just need/want the heel blank. Even those 1s that you posted without the jumpman on the heel would be a possible cop if they were highs and the blank heel but different strokes for different folks.
It's kind of funny to me that 1's are all the hype now. I remember rocking different ones and people caying nice dunks.
I'm ready for the OG treatment on these but even with the jump man on the heel and tongue these were still great. Lets not act like we don't have any Air Jordan 1's with a jump man on the heel guys...