You got a premium LNM pairShoe Palace pair came early this morning.
If they had lemonade soles I was ready to place that return label back on the box.
Took a good amount of steps in the crib idk how people are walking to crease them so bad.
They don’t feel space jam thick but they don’t feel super super thin.
AIR JORDAN 11 “GRATITUDE” / THANK YOU - 12/09/2023
- Thread in 'Jordan Brand' Thread starter Started by Jordanbball,
- Start date
- 8,926
- 4,751
- Joined
- May 11, 2010
I'm content in sitting out. Retail+ NY sales tax is too much imo. Copped 2 pairs of NDS Jordans for less. Will come back to this shoe eventually.
- 8,958
- 12,501
- Joined
- Aug 11, 2015
2024 spring collection from JB is all pass for me thank you 
- 5,175
- 5,848
- Joined
- Dec 24, 2016
Wondering if these will go back up on NDC with all the returns for QC issues. Wouldn't mind a pair with that swoosh discount to beat up. As long as it ain't from the SZ factory
- 3,385
- 6,665
- Joined
- Sep 5, 2000
It turns out Santa is bringing me a pair of these after all. Cooking dinner for your girl 2-3 times a week can go a long way sometimes. Lol
KanyIZZY
formerly j o 19
- 18,358
- 47,808
- Joined
- Oct 1, 2004
Hibbetts pair I was returning finally came in. Was a restock because the left and right were misplaced and the right pair had a scratch. Thin PL LNM 
- 10
- 14
- Joined
- Jul 14, 2013
Was wearing mine today for a bit and they tore up the sides of my ankles. I guess since they are so stiff
- 689
- 2,066
- Joined
- Aug 26, 2012
Well I had every intention of shipping these back immediately due to creasegate, but they came out the box and seduced me. The toe box seems far less bulbous than the other remaster era 11s. In fact I’ve simply not been able to enjoy these 2016 and on 11s cuz the toes are crazy as hell looking to my eye that is used to the stubby nature of the 1996/2001 beauties. The thicker laces and wider vamp also go a long way in just being a much more convincing retro to discerning pundits such as myself. And the leather seems genuinely decent. Ultimately I’m keeping them IF they pass the wearability test. Happy holidays and sorry so lengthy. Onward to the powder 9s this spring!
- 5,880
- 1,857
- Joined
- Apr 7, 2002
SZ pair…
- 2,359
- 7,263
- Joined
- May 30, 2018
- 239
- 213
- Joined
- Jul 23, 2023
I’m confused what’s the LNM and stuff mean
- 1,097
- 2,785
- Joined
- Aug 11, 2013
I still wear the 2011 from time to time. I had like 3 pairs at one time. I think the nostalgia of how crazy that 2011 release was and what I went through to get my pairs is the only thing that makes it hard to part with that last pair. That was the last crazy/ camp out release that I was involved in. Good times.
Last edited:
- 5,175
- 5,848
- Joined
- Dec 24, 2016
- 12,598
- 27,273
- Joined
- Aug 9, 2014
- 3,385
- 6,665
- Joined
- Sep 5, 2000
LNM gang!!
- 93,981
- 33,011
- Joined
- Oct 24, 2010
- 12,598
- 27,273
- Joined
- Aug 9, 2014
So I think my pair is good quality for what JB is putting out. Sole looks nice and milky (
), creasing isn’t bad after a few wears. I assumed it was LNM but I just checked and they’re LN4. I think LN4 is pretty solid fwiw
), creasing isn’t bad after a few wears. I assumed it was LNM but I just checked and they’re LN4. I think LN4 is pretty solid fwiw
- 239
- 213
- Joined
- Jul 23, 2023
Thank you, which one is the general consensus in being superior? Also, where do you check to see which one it is?
- 1,199
- 3,963
- Joined
- Mar 6, 2019
- 8,958
- 12,501
- Joined
- Aug 11, 2015
What is SZ
- 1,097
- 2,785
- Joined
- Aug 11, 2013
I low key want to grab an SZ pair just to complete the set
LNM has 18k gold jumpman.
LN4 has 14k gold jumpman.
SZ has 10k gold jumpman.
Not srs
- 2,505
- 13,607
- Joined
- Dec 10, 2017
Have an LMN pair, and an LN4. Decided to rock the LN4. After a few wears and plenty of steps, they seem just fine.
Similar threads
