- Aug 11, 2013
- 1,288
- 3,433
Family photos with the older pairs. ‘18’s most likely headed to EBay in the near future. Still beat my ‘11’s and yes I do prefer them to the 18’s if I’m being honest. Only thing better on the 18 is the back tab.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I know wrong thread
Posted this previous In the wc3 reimagined thread.This silliness been going on forever, we just didn't used to pay attention. Here are some OG True Blues (lateral side) and OG Fire Reds (medial side). EP off on both of them. Do you think the original buyer cared or even noticed?They were about the same price as they are today (adjusted for inflation). Note: pics are not mine...
This is a great post. Not much has changed, none of this is new. I actually have two different prints on one shoe on a 2024 like the poster states he had on a 2001 lol. And yeah I just over the last few years realized a lot of the 2001’s has some ridiculously bold elephant print that wasn’t a good look.Posted this previous In the wc3 reimagined thread.
Posted this previous In the wc3 reimagined thread.
This is a great post. Not much has changed, none of this is new. I actually have two different prints on one shoe on a 2024 like the poster states he had on a 2001 lol. And yeah I just over the last few years realized a lot of the 2001’s has some ridiculously bold elephant print that wasn’t a good look.
Posted this previous In the wc3 reimagined thread.
The consensus regarding the EP at that time was nothing. In that era, heads didn’t even care or put their shoes under the scrutiny of a microscope, comparing them to the OGs like nobody’s business like they do now. So I don’t think there was a consensus other than people preferred they kept NA on the back instead of the jumpman and even that was niche talking point at the time and hadn’t grown legs yet. The bar for OG accuracy was real low for JB at that time.Thin print on 2001's were indeed hard to come by. I ended up with thin EP on my one and only pair...
Bonus....on my 2003 Wht/Cmt's too....but don't remember what the consensus was in terms of print on those......
Now thats how elephant print should look like.Thin print on 2001's were indeed hard to come by. I ended up with thin EP on my one and only pair...
Bonus....on my 2003 Wht/Cmt's too....but don't remember what the consensus was in terms of print on those......
The consensus regarding the EP at that time was nothing. In that era, heads didn’t even care or put their shoes under the scrutiny of a microscope, comparing them to the OGs like nobody’s business like they do now. So I don’t think there was a consensus other than people preferred they kept NA on the back instead of the jumpman and even that was niche talking point at the time and hadn’t grown legs yet. The bar for OG accuracy was real low for JB at that time.
Returned the made in china pair
And kept these 2 made in Vietnam
People were definitely complaining back then on NT but it was a small amount of people in the threads.
Every shoe that has been released in the NT era has had people complaining in threads.
Y’all are really too picky when it comes to this stuff. Plenty of other drops have similar or worse inconsistencies, I don’t know what all of a sudden it matters so much now.
Oh, I definitely get it. There are some terrible pairs out there that have obvious inconsistencies. Can’t lie, I was a bit scared opening mine up. Planned on keeping the best, and returning the other 2…. I’m keeping all 3 for the meantime.Heads are def too picky....but.....again, this is NT....the home of over obsessed sneaker heads.
To their point though, the Jordan 3 in particular is a unique shoe in that the elephant print and heights of panels can make the shoe look completely off/different if they're incorrect.
Where as an Air Force 1, or even certain Jordan models don't matter as much in terms of overall appearance if a few subtle things are off.
If there's a shoe to be picky with it's the Jordan 3.
I know ima get hate for this but I actually miss the little red over the tongues of the shoes. Especially on the white cements. Now im not saying the super poofy *** SB style we was getting in the 2010's but I feel like the 1994 pair had it perfect.Thin print on 2001's were indeed hard to come by. I ended up with thin EP on my one and only pair...
Bonus....on my 2003 Wht/Cmt's too....but don't remember what the consensus was in terms of print on those......