AIR JORDAN 3 BLACK CEMENT - NOVEMBER 23, 2024

I know ima get hate for this but I actually miss the little red over the tongues of the shoes. Especially on the white cements. Now im not saying the super poofy *** SB style we was getting in the 2010's but I feel like the 1994 pair had it perfect.

Some continue to embrace the puffy tongue while others have completely disavowed it.
 
I seemed to have confused you. I'm not talking about what people thought back then of the EP on the 2003 Wht/Cmt's. I remember clearly people never really mentioned it nor cared as much as they do today.

I mean, and I'm asking now too....what did the majority of 2003 Wht/Cmt's have in terms of elephant print? Thin vs. thick.

Was it mostly thin, like on my pair? Was it mostly thick like on 2001 Blk/Cmt's? Or did it simply vary? I don't remember.
Oh I see what you’re saying. I think the 2001s mostly had thick EP and the ones with thick EP were outliers but I could be wrong. Could have been about even, mostly luck of draw as far as the thickness of EP you got.
 
Oh I see what you’re saying. I think the 2001s mostly had thick EP and the ones with thick EP were outliers but I could be wrong. Could have been about even, mostly luck of draw as far as the thickness of EP you got.

I'm asking about the 2003 Wht/Cmts.

Lol lots of confusion here. 😁
 
dhtowng dhtowng .....You seem to disagree via your post just above.
I don’t disagree that there were complaints at that time (I.e. my reference to complaints about lack of NA on the back at that time) just don’t think there were many if any complaints about EP at that time. That’s all I was saying.
 
Last edited:
I'm asking about the 2003 Wht/Cmts.

Lol lots of confusion here. 😁
Oh dang I meant 2003 White/Cements lol. Come to think of it I do remember most 2003 WCs looking like yours. I was referring to 3s from that era rather than ‘03 WCs specifically. Sorry for the confusion bro. I’ll sit this one out lol. My bad.
 
Oh dang I meant 2003 White/Cements lol. Come to think of it I do remember most 2003 WCs looking like yours. Sorry for confusion bro. I’ll sit this one out lol. My bad.


Haha nah all good. Thanks. Yeah I think I remember too white cement 2003s EP being on the thinner side for the most part. JB has been schizophrenic with EP over time. 🙄
 
IMG_0126.jpeg
 
I seemed to have confused you. I'm not talking about what people thought back then of the EP on the 2003 Wht/Cmt's. I remember clearly people never really mentioned it nor cared as much as they do today.

I mean, and I'm asking now too....what did the majority of 2003 Wht/Cmt's have in terms of elephant print? Thin vs. thick.

Was it mostly thin, like on my pair? Was it mostly thick like on 2001 Blk/Cmt's? Or did it simply vary? I don't remember.
My pair of 2003’s had the thinner print as well.
 
IMG_1938.jpeg
IMG_1939.jpeg
Sheikh pair. The left has a sleek toebox. The right one does not look good as the left one. I need to find a right side sneaker that matches this left.
VW1 11.5


I had the same issue with my couple of pairs.

Great left shoe......so so right shoe.

I'm wearing the pair I'm keeping. Not a big deal.
 
All three of my tts pairs are unbelievably tight in the toe box.

Even my half size up pair feels snug.

May have to go with that, even if they feel a tad too big after a few wears.
 
All three of my tts pairs are unbelievably tight in the toe box.

Even my half size up pair feels snug.

May have to go with that, even if they feel a tad too big after a few wears.
Biggest mistake going TTS on these. They run small. I went up .5 for 2 pairs and even went 1 full size for another.
 
Back
Top Bottom