- 191
- 23
How's the fit compared to the fire reds if you have them? Those were pretty true to sizeI'm very impressed with my pair! They finally came today.
Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
How's the fit compared to the fire reds if you have them? Those were pretty true to sizeI'm very impressed with my pair! They finally came today.
The fire reds were almost a whole size down on my feet. A half size wasnt tight enought a whole size was too tightHow's the fit compared to the fire reds if you have them? Those were pretty true to size
Botheeeee these or the Thunder 4s?
iJapino said they fit like the WC IVs, so I'm just going to go off that.
eeeee these or the Thunder 4s?
Eh kind of odd. I fit an 11 pretty average little room little tight and compared to one of the shoes that are definitely half a size big i fit a 10.5 in the playoff XII.The fire reds were almost a whole size down on my feet. A half size wasnt tight enought a whole size was too tight
eeeee these or the Thunder 4s?
iJapino said they fit like the WC IVs, so I'm just going to go off that.
thing is I didn't care bout those shoes so I didn't keep up with the thread and so I don't know how the white cements fit
these crap on the Thunders.
iJapino said they fit like the WC IVs, so I'm just going to go off that.
thing is I didn't care bout those shoes so I didn't keep up with the thread and so I don't know how the white cements fit
There was some disagreement about the WC's, but I think the general consensus was to go down 0.5
For the most part recent IV's have run approximately 0.5 too big
But as always, to each his own
They look good. But the "black looks too black" and the laces look too "lacy"I'm very impressed with my pair! They finally came today.
Sorry Boss but this pair its "early release" b-grade...
EDIT: Also this is not me soliciting a sale or trade. I dont do that on this site. Only through a Chicagoland facebook group
^I agree. I hate all recent VIs because of it. I passed on all but the Olys that just came out and regret with a passion getting those. I guess I was just thirsthin for that colorway. The blue is too dark, the toebox makes the shoe look like boots you would see a male stripper wear in a parody porn, the icy blues browned up fast (even if you didnt wear em), and they were a full size down. There is not a single good thing I can say about that shoe.
A true size 11.5 in all 2010 and 2012 VI retroes look like **** and it is because of the toebox. IDK how much I can sell a slightly used pair for because I truly want to get rid of them. Only thing wrong with them is the midsole on the heel and toe arent pure white from me wearing em a few times and the sole is already browning.
But I just have this thing where I can't sell something unless it is a good deal for me. :/ Hopefully I find someone who is thirsthin for them and I can arrange a trade where I will give him shoes and maybe some money on top for something he has that I want
I was this close to coppin an early release pair too.Sorry Boss but this pair its "early release" b-grade...
Check the nubuck line , how the stiching "meets" the grey outsole...
A lot of early IV have this problem..
It should be like this :
NO HATE of cource...!!!
By the way, i am happy to meet you again in the new NKTALK !
The thunders.eeeee these or the Thunder 4s?
Of course its early release,but it hasnt this defect! The pic its not mine..i just posted it to see the difference.So the second pair pictured isn't an "early release"? Even though these don't release for more than a month?
Also, could that line (stitching meeting grey outsole) have to do with the two pairs pictured being different sizes?
Just trying to make sense of all this.