Air Jordan III OG Black Cement returns Feb 2018 - Nike Air on the back

What’s the sizing?

  • 1/2 Size Big (buy a half size down)

    Votes: 57 8.4%
  • True to Size (buy your true size)

    Votes: 551 80.9%
  • 1/2 Size Small (buy a half size up)

    Votes: 73 10.7%

  • Total voters
    681
I'm saying man. It's almost like NT is against the notion that we all have different preferences...












With that said... Reported for the AMM3 comment.
UJoKsWE.png
Just contradicted yourself. :lol:
 
Serious question for all out there. For any model Jordan. OG color with today shapes, or plus color with OG shape? To me, JB likes playing these games regarding this. What would you be more willing to buy?
 
Serious question for all out there. For any model Jordan. OG color with today shapes, or plus color with OG shape? To me, JB likes playing these games regarding this. What would you be more willing to buy?
OG with today's shape.
 
Complaining about the 3s when Reebok been consistently droppin reebok questions in premium uppers and decent collabs. Y’all hold jb to a different standard aka none
 
But if it was switched around and the OG shape was the current shape and vice versa yall would switch it up too. :lol:

Ill give yall another shocker, AMM3’s right up there with BC3’s as best 3’s ever. Yep, ever. Debatable which one is top dog.

Im 32. Shape aint THAT big of a deal unless its wildly weird looking, yall 45 year olds really draggin it.

Dude stay off the meth.
 
And yall still copped. :lol:
Nope. Hadn’t bought a III since 2003 till AMMs, and it’s tied with XI as my favorite model—when it looks like it’s supposed to. The OG is GOAT because of the way it looked overall, not because it was the OG. If it looked like the crap retro version, it wouldn’t be my favorite. It would be on the list of Jordans I don’t like. For example, I wouldn’t buy an VIII if it came brand new out of a time machine from ‘93.
You keep saying we’re dragging it. News flash: that’s how you effect change. You probably thought complaints about the previous version of the XI was dragging it, too. If not for that, they probably never would’ve fixed it. If you genuinely prefer the retros, great. But that’s irrelevant to the point pretty much everyone else is making.
 
Nope. Hadn’t bought a III since 2003 till AMMs, and it’s tied with XI as my favorite model—when it looks like it’s supposed to. The OG is GOAT because of the way it looked overall, not because it was the OG. If it looked like the crap retro version, it wouldn’t be my favorite. It would be on the list of Jordans I don’t like. For example, I wouldn’t buy an VIII if it came brand new out of a time machine from ‘93.
You keep saying we’re dragging it. News flash: that’s how you effect change. You probably thought complaints about the previous version of the XI was dragging it, too. If not for that, they probably never would’ve fixed it. If you genuinely prefer the retros, great. But that’s irrelevant to the point pretty much everyone else is making.


News flash also: it probably not gonna change. Why? Cause most people are fine with the shape.
 
News flash also: it probably not gonna change. Why? Cause most people are fine with the shape.
Most people just want the shoes and don't care about anything we talk about on here.

That's precisely why we use this forum. To talk about shoes with other people that share a similar passion.

Then you come along and say we shouldn't talk about it.

Good times.
 
Most people just want the shoes and don't care about anything we talk about on here.

That's precisely why we use this forum. To talk about shoes with other people that share a similar passion.

Then you come along and say we shouldn't talk about it.

Good times.

Agreed. It’s actually beneficial to discuss some of the flaws because it could be eventually fixed in the future.

The newer shape is almost a decent mold.

They improved and minimized the EP height, fixed the ankle collar height, and also minimized the padding around the ankle.

Using Girl Thats Jules Girl Thats Jules photo as reference…

IMO this is one area they need to improve on and make more consistent.

I’ve seen a lot of pairs with the same issue where there’s a slight curve around the mid foot towards the back of the shoe. This might have to do more with the manufacturing process when they are attaching the upper to the midsole/sole which is causing this design flaw.

D6DA7182-9883-4A47-A2BE-F1277903FBB6.jpeg
 
That's precisely why we use this forum. To talk about shoes with other people that share a similar passion.

Then you come along and say we shouldn't talk about it.

Good times.


You saying im saying not to talk about it…but im literally also talking about it.


 
You saying im saying not to talk about it…but im literally also talking about it.



You're free to like whichever rendition of these you prefer. Talk about it all you'd like as well.

Other people have different experiences then you. They'd also like to talk about it. And that's OK.

Right?
 
Agreed. It’s actually beneficial to discuss some of the flaws because it could be eventually fixed in the future.

The newer shape is almost a decent mold.

They improved and minimized the EP height, fixed the ankle collar height, and also minimized the padding around the ankle.

Using Girl Thats Jules Girl Thats Jules photo as reference…

IMO this is one area they need to improve on and make more consistent.

I’ve seen a lot of pairs with the same issue where there’s a slight curve around the mid foot towards the back of the shoe. This might have to do more with the manufacturing process when they are attaching the upper to the midsole/sole which is causing this design flaw.

D6DA7182-9883-4A47-A2BE-F1277903FBB6.jpeg
👊👊
 
You're free to like whichever rendition of these you prefer. Talk about it all you'd like as well.

Other people have different experiences then you. They'd also like to talk about it. And that's OK.

Right?


I said the mold talk is old, itll never change yadda yadda. I never said dont talk about it ever again. If that were to happen then dear lord what would be the talk in threads like these?
 
And not everyone wants a 1:1 mold like the OG’s from 1988.

There are some enthusiasts that would prefer that, but Nike would find a way to butcher the shape anyways… see the “85 OG” mold :lol

With that said, the current mold (i.e. Cool Greys, United, Georgetowns) is a decent rendition for the AJ3. There are always opportunity for improvement with each release. By all means highlight, nitpick, complain until we the consumers get what we want.
 
Agreed. It’s actually beneficial to discuss some of the flaws because it could be eventually fixed in the future.

The newer shape is almost a decent mold.

They improved and minimized the EP height, fixed the ankle collar height, and also minimized the padding around the ankle.

Using Girl Thats Jules Girl Thats Jules photo as reference…

IMO this is one area they need to improve on and make more consistent.

I’ve seen a lot of pairs with the same issue where there’s a slight curve around the mid foot towards the back of the shoe. This might have to do more with the manufacturing process when they are attaching the upper to the midsole/sole which is causing this design flaw.

D6DA7182-9883-4A47-A2BE-F1277903FBB6.jpeg
See this is where I agree with picasso swerve picasso swerve like seriously who's paying attention to this? Like even though you pointed it out I still don't see what you're talking about. Y'all are nitpicking. Shoes weren't perfect back then, they aren't perfect now..
 
Back
Top Bottom