AIR JORDAN IV FROM THE IV/XIX PACK!!!!!!!PIX

^^^ you guys are WAY off! the biggest difference is the toe box is about 1,639 times longer than the '99 retros, you can't honestly tell me that youdon't notice the difference. it's like looking @ the differences between rosie o'donnell and rachel starr (if you don't know who it is, lookher up!).
 
NTers these days = whine bc nike wont release them...whine if they do.... quit complaining. they aint changing them. it is what it is. nag nag nag...beetchbeetch beetch. 18s pages of complaining.
 
Originally Posted by K20Lee

^^^ you guys are WAY off! the biggest difference is the toe box is about 1,639 times longer than the '99 retros, you can't honestly tell me that you don't notice the difference. it's like looking @ the differences between rosie o'donnell and rachel starr (if you don't know who it is, look her up!).

The toe box is the same size as the 2006 retros. The pics looks extra weird I think because they might have been taken with a wide angle lens. And RachelStarr is one of the ugliest %#%*+%@ in porn, so please get up on your porn game as well.
 
Originally Posted by hypeNT500

Originally Posted by ChampionHood

Originally Posted by shoeking2345

Originally Posted by Trav T

What's with those complaining about Nike Air not being on the back? They haven't been like that since '99, so seriously, were you really expecting them to change it back?
cosign

what kinda cop out is that?! most retros are 15-16 years old...look at da nike side of things...da techchallenges are no longer "lava" cuz it isn't 1990?
grin.gif
stupid excuse right..yeah, so apply it to da Jordan IV's that were already retroed perfectly 9 years ago....what happened, all of a sudden they forgot to do that? a billion dollar company forgot how to give us that?
smh.gif

JB uses cheaper material to save more money for them. the design of the iv's cause the cheap material to lose the overall shape so they decided to alter the design of the shoe to help keep the shape using weaker more inferior material. i believe this it the reason why the design is so different....

Then JB shouldn't say that their shoes are quality products because they using cheap material.
As for the Nike Air argument, I've been known that it was not coming back even though the insiders on this site swear it wascoming back. Jumpman on the back, fine. BUT I have a problem with this shoe because they look exactly like fakes. The netting, shape, everything. If they atleast resorted back to the original mold of the 99s with a Jumpman on the back, it would've been less of a issue but people here don't care.

And no I never owned a pair of the Black/Reds if that matters.
 
Originally Posted by CarmineJordan

Originally Posted by StrongMind3

Originally Posted by CarmineJordan

Instead of retroing a IV they should have butcher it to a new colorway......like they did to the 10,14,21

the 10 wasnt a new color way

Yes it was son.........they are the smoke greys with 23 not shadow tens

oh word? (and im not your son) why are they always referred to as the shadows? i've never head anyone call them the "smoke greys". and pleasedont take this as me trying to go against you im just interested in knowing.
 
I'm unhappy as hell. I've got some rotting OG's...and some 99's I'm getting scared to wear.

But copped (if I can), the colourway's too perfect - sue me.
 
Originally Posted by nuffkicks

like chris brown, no air
smh.gif
LMFAO!!

Yeah...I think Ima still cop honestly. I love IV's , I've never had an og pair , but I can only imagine from descripition what Im missin out on
embarassed.gif
 
Without the nike air it just looks weird, but I refuse to spend 300 on some 99s when I know JB will never drop these exactly the same as OGs. So copped Iguess.
 
On Second thought, I was on ebay looking at these and I can't take why should I stand for a shoe that looks exactly like a fake. I had a fake pair of theseback in 8th grade roast me. But I loved em the nike air, the shape they were great and lasted me a while.
 
Yall folks on here are bugging..Always complianing DAMN the shoes are ok and yall doing all this talking but when the shoes are release you will be the firstline to COP..GEt over it the 4s are COOLL...
roll.gif
 
Originally Posted by Supermanblue79

You're wasting your time NT.
The average "she like my dougie" customer is not even going to remember the original shape of the 99's, and would much rather have the Jumpman on the back of thier "Jays" than a Nike Air logo. And plus..."these limited".
Face it people this is the new direction of JB.
wow... that was.... i dont even know... :/ i love niketalk
 
Originally Posted by fly1587

Yall folks on here are bugging..Always complianing DAMN the shoes are ok and yall doing all this talking but when the shoes are release you will be the first line to COP..GEt over it the 4s are COOLL...
roll.gif

yep. you got everyone figured out at NT.
indifferent.gif


128128601_0d86d6987e.jpg
 
Originally Posted by blackcat23mj

NTers these days = whine bc nike wont release them...whine if they do.... quit complaining. they aint changing them. it is what it is. nag nag nag...beetch beetch beetch. 18s pages of complaining.

I agree 1000%. 18 pages of people whining and complaining, yet somehow these J's, like most of the others, will sell out in minutes.

I should say that I do agree that the quality of J's has decreased quite a bit in recent years, but it bugs me when people are SO angry at the waythe mesh slants or at the "shape" of the shoe. I couldn't care less about the slight difference in both those things. But that's me. Everyone's entitled to their opinion, I just think some people are blowing it out of proportion.

I think the problem is that people have become so jaded because of the amount of fakes that have flooded the market. It has made people skeptical andover-analytical about every aspect of the shoe, right down to the shape of the shoe and the slant of the mesh... ridiculous.

I'm 34 years old and I guess I was just lucky enough to have been there since the beginning, when things were a little more "pure". There wereno fakes. Hell, there wasn't even an internet. Honestly, until around 2002, I had absolutely no idea that other people shared the same love for Jordans Idid, other than myself and one of my friends! lol

I think if we want things to change for real, we need to voice our opinions directly to Brand Jordan or Nike. Unfortunately, whining on a sneaker forumdoesn't get you too far... especially when all these "low quality" shoes sell out in minutes, as I mentioned earlier!
 
you can't honestly tell me that you don't notice the difference. it's like looking @ the differences between rosie o'donnell and rachel starr

And Rachel Starr is one of the ugliest %#%*+%@
I'm actually more insulted by this statement than there being no Nike Air.
 
Originally Posted by B1LLY HOYLE

you can't honestly tell me that you don't notice the difference. it's like looking @ the differences between rosie o'donnell and rachel starr
And Rachel Starr is one of the ugliest %#%*+%@
I'm actually more insulted by this statement than there being no Nike Air.


laugh.gif
laugh.gif
 
Back
Top Bottom