dudes were mad at me in the royal thread for saying this but its the damn truth
the royals suck compared to the vegas regardless of them having a fricking jumpman
the bulid height & leather are all better
but to dudes who paid $350+ for a pair you cant tell them anything about thier precious royals
dudes were mad at me in the royal thread for saying this but its the damn truth
the royals suck compared to the vegas regardless of them having a fricking jumpman
the bulid height & leather are all better
but to dudes who paid $350+ for a pair you cant tell them anything about thier precious royals
It's actually not even close in quality comparison. The Vegas 1s are rt there with the banned 1s quality. With that nice thick tumbled leather. I was shocked when I copped them. Lol. The height is true to the og form as well. Like u stated. The Vegas 1s can be had for retail or I've even some ppl state they saw them on sale for below retail. Complete steal. Right when I saw the quality I tripled up on those bad boys, I love the black and white also. Very sick shoe. Just cause it didn't say Nike air tho the hypebeast left it alone.
?
dudes were mad at me in the royal thread for saying this but its the damn truth
the royals suck compared to the vegas regardless of them having a fricking jumpman
the bulid height & leather are all better
but to dudes who paid $350+ for a pair you cant tell them anything about thier precious royals
It's actually not even close in quality comparison. The Vegas 1s are rt there with the banned 1s quality. With that nice thick tumbled leather. I was shocked when I copped them. Lol. The height is true to the og form as well. Like u stated. The Vegas 1s can be had for retail or I've even some ppl state they saw them on sale for below retail. Complete steal. Right when I saw the quality I tripled up on those bad boys, I love the black and white also. Very sick shoe. Just cause it didn't say Nike air tho the hypebeast left it alone.
I was just making a generalization, and now you are making assumptions about me? You are the sad loser with nothing better to do than attack someone with an opinion. Last time I checked my gf, mother, sister, grandmother and great grandmother were all matching their girly outfits. Think what you want. I'm done with this.Since dudes match their outfits, they're considered feminine/girly in your opinion?
You must be one of them dudes still stuck on the "all black everything" movement .. either that or you wear camo pants with everything to show of your masculinity
Age has nothing to do with it, we as a community simply don't understand your logic.
However, you're entitled to your idiotic opinion tho
I'm not sure what SF got but Nike Mall of America got I believe 34 pairs.
I was just making a generalization, and now you are making assumptions about me? You are the sad loser with nothing better to do than attack someone with an opinion. Last time I checked my gf, mother, sister, grandmother and great grandmother were all matching their girly outfits. Think what you want. I'm done with this.Since dudes match their outfits, they're considered feminine/girly in your opinion?
You must be one of them dudes still stuck on the "all black everything" movement .. either that or you wear camo pants with everything to show of your masculinity
Age has nothing to do with it, we as a community simply don't understand your logic.
However, you're entitled to your idiotic opinion tho
cool story about the females in your family bro, you win!
What I said wasn't an absurd statement or assumption or even a generalization. It is a fact. I have read the posts and so have you.Now I'm a loser because you made an absurd statement/assumpiton about "Dudes here dying shoes, cleaning after every wear and matching their outfits" and tried to justify it as an opinion, then back track and say it was a "generalization?"cool story about the females in your family bro, you win!
So shoe cleaning is a chick thing?Now I'm a loser because you made an absurd statement/assumpiton about "Dudes here dying shoes, cleaning after every wear and matching their outfits" and tried to justify it as an opinion, then back track and say it was a "generalization?"
What I said wasn't an absurd statement or assumption or even a generalization. It is a fact. I have read the posts and so have you.
But didn't those drop last year
Now I'm a loser because you made an absurd statement/assumpiton about "Dudes here dying shoes, cleaning after every wear and matching their outfits" and tried to justify it as an opinion, then back track and say it was a "generalization?"
What I said wasn't an absurd statement or assumption or even a generalization. It is a fact. I have read the posts and so have you.
So shoe cleaning is a chick thing?
But didn't those drop last year
Yea they did I'm trippin lol
.. One of my favorite pick ups this year.
It's all good I just got my pair 2 weeks ago and I can't stop wearing them
I don't. I gave my opinion and it was blown out of proportion by another user.
hahahahaha woooooow
And what's the purpose of shining them. To make them look clean. Duh
