- 56,520
- 65,351
Originally Posted by FrenchBlue23
If no 3M, it would definitely be a pass with no hesitation.Originally Posted by Daver
Originally Posted by memphissfinest
I WAS THE ONLY GUY IN THE FLINT 13 THREAD WHO WAS MAD AT THEM TAKING OUT THE 3M. IT WAS DEVASTATING ON THAT SHOE AND WILL BE DEVASTING ON THIS SHOE IF IT ISN'T INCLUDED. I'M SURE DUDES IN HERE WILL FIND A WAY TO DEFEND THE DECISION WITH THE SAME COMMENTS AS IN THE FLINT THREAD, "I'M TOO OLD FOR THAT FLASHY 3M TONGUE. I'M GLAD THEY TOOK IT OUT."
Nah..I actually agree with you on this one. They should keep it true to form. I passed on the '10 flints cuz of the 3m removal. I went to cop, but after taking a look at them in person, I put it back and walked out the store. I'm really really hoping everything comes correct on this years retro..
Memphis,I remember that person saying they are too old for 3M on the 13's anyway, even though 35 year old MJ wore them back in 1998.
Dudes are funny as hell.
I remember the too old for 3M comment also
I ignore 80% of these dudes, because half weren't around for the OG's so they don't know how they looked in the first place and the other half are just trying to convince themselves the kicks are really hot.