- 55,259
- 62,620
- Joined
- May 15, 2003
So you're determining a sneaker being cheap by pics and not all the 32's they've put out?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
One of the pros of this sig is that its materials look and feel more premium than its competitors. Dunno why you think it looks cheap when on feet and in person they look and feel great.I can't believe how Jordan Brand uses cheap materials on this 32. They used to use nice materials on the sig shoe. A lot of these just look so cheap.
Did they have any other decent retros down there?
So you're determining a sneaker being cheap by pics and not all the 32's they've put out?
I'm really late to the AJ 32 party, but I normally wait for deep discounts unless it's just a shoe I absolutely have to have. Yesterday I finally pulled the trigger on the Why Not's...these do feel a tad bit roomy in the toebox and unfortunately I wasn't able to try half size down. I like everything about the shoe so far...lockdown, cushioning and support seem to be great. Got these specifically for ball, and my current rotation consists of the LBJ 15 and Harden Vol. 2's...so I value cushioning and fit over all other features. Went half size down in both of those models, hoping that TTS works for me in this shoe.
Has anyone has worn these for a while experienced the flyknit stretching out over time?
Man those are hope they release. Those should have been the banned 32s!
Thanks for the response bro. I've seen mixed reviews about the traction on these, so depending on results I'm sure there are a number of factors at play.
Good thing is I purchased from Nike, so I have the 30 day window to decide whether or not to keep them. Hopefully I'll get a chance to test them out later today
Did you get a chance to play? If so, how was the traction?
It has been said before, but I'll say it again: IMO, the fact that the brand has almost exclusively used clear soles on the recent Air Jordan models is appalling.
Why have they gone this direction?
Evidence shows that clear soles don't age well in terms of remaining clear. Most adults hold on to their shoes for many years. Aesthetically, I'd rather have a solid-colored (or some other variety) sole that complements the colorway that isn't subject to yellowing.
I am a fan of the XXXII, but the only colorway I've been compelled to purchase was limited to 323 pairs - virtually unobtainable.
If any of the black-based colorways had a black outsole - perhaps even a black translucent outsole - I'd have purchased them. For some reason that's not what we were offered.
Another example is the new sand colored lowtop a few posts above: wouldn't a tonal sand colored sole have been as appealing?
If you're in the know, let me know. I don't understand and I'm mad discouraged
+
Alot of fire sitting at nike store beverly . i got 32s as slow classics. Slowly people will realise these are super fire .
Why don’t you like clear sole? I don’t understand.