- 146
- 695
- Joined
- May 12, 2022
Air Jordan XXXVII (37) first look…
- Thread in 'Jordan Brand' Thread starter Started by AIR J XIII,
- Start date
- 3,275
- 6,285
- Joined
- Mar 16, 2020
Where yall getting these images from?
- 4,805
- 7,983
- Joined
- May 12, 2003
IG tags
- 4,780
- 5,114
- Joined
- Jul 29, 2012
I’d be willing to bet this is the take down model. If I recall correctly the 35 had a similar model and the situation played out the same. (That take down model was also missing the eclipse plate.)
- 4,805
- 7,983
- Joined
- May 12, 2003
Why would Tatum be wearing a takedown model though? He’s been in only the sig model for the last few years and has his own sig coming.
- 4,780
- 5,114
- Joined
- Jul 29, 2012
Could be his own sig but I don’t think it’s the 37
- 4,805
- 7,983
- Joined
- May 12, 2003
I doubt they’d be taking cues from the aj7 for his sig, with the 37 on the horizon. We will see I guess.
- 1,090
- 1,390
- Joined
- Dec 6, 2000
I miss the days before everyone had a camera and they had to scan the new Jordan’s on a copier to leak pics.
- 4,805
- 7,983
- Joined
- May 12, 2003
Seeing the new jordan for the 1st time here on NT was the best days. Started with the AJ16 For me.
- 34,399
- 27,573
- Joined
- Dec 9, 2002
.
- 10,118
- 16,708
- Joined
- Sep 6, 2000
Anybody here remember the days of having to beg the managers to see the catalog...which they only did if you were in good enough with them? So many memories of my first glimpse of the new models that way.
- 32,868
- 38,479
- Joined
- Jul 18, 2012
35 was super trash. These already look better.
- 34,399
- 27,573
- Joined
- Dec 9, 2002
These are looking like a mid version of the 11 ie so far
- 13,215
- 10,730
- Joined
- Feb 7, 2016
I would consider them trash considering the injury I suffered from them. freaking eclipse plate b.s.
- 34,399
- 27,573
- Joined
- Dec 9, 2002
35 was pure trash.
- 2,428
- 5,187
- Joined
- Feb 3, 2019
35s > 34s easy
- 32,868
- 38,479
- Joined
- Jul 18, 2012
- 13,215
- 10,730
- Joined
- Feb 7, 2016
Attachments
- 4,805
- 7,983
- Joined
- May 12, 2003
31 and 34 still reign supreme for the new 30 year thing they’re doing. The 36 ain’t far behind.
- 32,868
- 38,479
- Joined
- Jul 18, 2012
- 11,125
- 5,298
- Joined
- Feb 23, 2006
31’s even after Jordan Brand addressed the traction issue that many had complaints about reign supreme? It took until after the all star pair before there was different compound for the outsole. No sir.
- 13,215
- 10,730
- Joined
- Feb 7, 2016
I like the classic look of the 31 but performance got it grounded.
I know I'm in the minority but I love the 32s. not sure what some have against it though?
- 4,805
- 7,983
- Joined
- May 12, 2003
I was just going off looks and comfort. 34 takes it performance wise for me. 31 looks great though too. I like the 32 but they look like long *** skis no matter what size they are.
- 13,215
- 10,730
- Joined
- Feb 7, 2016
not sure about the skis comment but for me, they look really nice. performance was also great for me. 34s were an upgrade especially with the SE, but the 36 so far took the performance crown from the 34s.
I've been wearing the Jumps for awhile now and I must say that they felt equally great as the 36, just different. it's like an upgraded version of the Lebron 15s if you like those.
- 3,275
- 6,285
- Joined
- Mar 16, 2020
31 wasnt around for it.
32 outstanding shoe but the shroud killed it. Lows were good.
33 not a aj3 guy
34 fire but needed more colorways(especially with a black bottom)
35 same vibe as the aj5's. Like'em a lot but wouldnt wear them.
36 same as 34.
32 outstanding shoe but the shroud killed it. Lows were good.
33 not a aj3 guy
34 fire but needed more colorways(especially with a black bottom)
35 same vibe as the aj5's. Like'em a lot but wouldnt wear them.
36 same as 34.
