Air Jordan XXXVII (37) first look…

[urn0tlike]

35s are , just unwearable for me cause of the arch.

 

[picasso swerve]

It’s strange how you two say the 35’s a “Trash” when visually, the shoes are very similar to the 36’s.

Cmon son.

The lines and thiccness of the 35 is all trash. That middle part is terrible, fatass midsole. No redeeming qualities for that mess.

 

[vettez06]

Cmon son.

The lines and thiccness of the 35 is all trash. That middle part is terrible, fatass midsole. No redeeming qualities for that mess.

Yes the lines are different but the silhouette, midsole and overall look of the shoes are very similar.

So for you to like one and say the others is trash, you get the bigger

 

[picasso swerve]

Yes the lines are different but the silhouette, midsole and overall look of the shoes are very similar.

So for you to like one and say the others is trash, you get the bigger

Are you okay?

Lets just use this logic of yours.

Yes the lines are different but the silhouette, midsole and overall look of the shoes are very similar.

So for you to like one and say the others is trash, you get the bigger bigger

 

[vettez06]

Are you okay?

Lets just use this logic of yours.

Yes the lines are different but the silhouette, midsole and overall look of the shoes are very similar.

So for you to like one and say the others is trash, you get the bigger bigger

Apparently you’re not “Ok”.

 

[picasso swerve]

Apparently you’re not “Ok”.

Uhuh.

 

[vettez06]

Uhuh.

You’re good, your perception isn’t the reality and you can’t be shown any different.

You’ll be ok, now go outside and play.

 

[picasso swerve]

You’re good, your perception isn’t the reality and you can’t be shown any different.

You’ll be ok, now go outside and play.

Uhuh.

 

[sneeker]

It’s strange how you two say the 35’s a “Trash” when visually, the shoes are very similar to the 36’s.

they are not similar, they look different. but the 35 do shine on some colorways aesthetically. other than that, it will be forever the shoe that almost broke my foot permanently.

 

[sneeker]

Cmon son.

The lines and thiccness of the 35 is all trash. That middle part is terrible, fatass midsole. No redeeming qualities for that mess.

what mess?

 

[sooperhooper]

Dude needs glasses

 

[vettez06]

they are not similar, they look different. but the 35 do shine on some colorways aesthetically. other than that, it will be forever the shoe that almost broke my foot permanently.

You’re right, it’s a totally different design and they look nothing alike.

 

[vettez06]

Dude needs glasses

You need eyes.

 

[vettez06]

Uhuh.

 

[T_p_Hill]

Like the 35s but...nothing like the 34/36.
If going in sequence with regards to aesthetics its 35 34 36.
35s came across as a step backwards and are chunky as hell in contrast to the more sleek feel and appearance of the 34/36. Dont ball and yet the plate on the 35s is rather uncomfortable even for basic gym workouts. Think they were trying to develope something more beefy for Zion.

 

[Vegeta's hairline]

35s > 34s easy

34s got the slight edge, but 35s definitely not trash tho

It’s strange how you two say the 35’s a “Trash” when visually, the shoes are very similar to the 36’s.

I worn the 35s with jeans and got compliments. They're the best after the 34 imo.

 

[vettez06]

34s got the slight edge, but 35s definitely not trash tho

I worn the 35s with jeans and got compliments. They're the best after the 34 imo.

And you’ll continue to get compliments because it’s a good looking shoe.

I’ve asked three people and they all said the 36’s look like the 35’s.

But maybe all four of us need glasses or new eyes.

 

[sicembu]

I liked the 35 low but the mids didn't do much for me just like the 36 mid. I do think they're both very similar as well but there are subtle differences.

 

[sneeker]

34s got the slight edge, but 35s definitely not trash tho

I worn the 35s with jeans and got compliments. They're the best after the 34 imo.

I also got compliments wearing my DNA 35s, but not as much as the 34 SEs that people kept on asking what they are and where I got them. The biggest fail of the 35 is that horrible midplate.

 

[Vegeta's hairline]

I also got compliments wearing my DNA 35s, but not as much as the 34 SEs that people kept on asking what they are and where I got them. The biggest fail of the 35 is that horrible midplate.

The 34 se was so clean. Jb/nike should've made more color ways.

 

[picasso swerve]

And you’ll continue to get compliments because it’s a good looking shoe.

I’ve asked three people and they all said the 36’s look like the 35’s.

But maybe all four of us need glasses or new eyes.

Now ask again if the 35 is a good looking shoe.


The **** you so mad for. You the head designer for the 35?

 

[vettez06]

Now ask again if the 35 is a good looking shoe.


The **** you so mad for. You the head designer for the 35?

You’re not good with assumptions because I’m not mad or angry. I simply said they look alike, which most humans looking at the two shoes would agree with.

So **** *** you ******* ******.

 

[picasso swerve]

You’re not good with assumptions because I’m not mad or angry. I simply said they look alike, which most humans looking at the two shoes would agree with.

So **** *** you ******* ******.

You didnt just say they look like, they look alike so they must be both good looking is what you said. Do I need to bring up the Fila 11’s again?

 

[vettez06]

You didnt just say they look like, they look alike so they must be both good looking is what you said. Do I need to bring up the Fila 11’s again?

You can bring up the Fila 37’s if you‘d like.

You said the 35’s are trash when the literally look like the 36’s so your opinion’s strange, that’s all.

One of us needs our eyes checked, “You” but I’ll say that mine need to be checked to end this back and fourth.

 

[NToweG]

Someone will always not agree with an opinion. Better fish to fry.