- Jan 22, 2007
- 13,287
- 12,670
35s are 
, just unwearable for me cause of the arch.
, just unwearable for me cause of the arch.Air Jordan XXXVII (37) first look…
- Thread in 'Jordan Brand' Thread starter Started by AIR J XIII,
- Start date
- Jul 18, 2012
- 34,211
- 40,121
It’s strange how you two say the 35’s a “Trash” when visually, the shoes are very similar to the 36’s.
Cmon son.
The lines and thiccness of the 35 is all trash. That middle part is terrible, fatass midsole. No redeeming qualities for that mess.
- Jan 2, 2014
- 4,855
- 7,400
Cmon son.
The lines and thiccness of the 35 is all trash. That middle part is terrible, fatass midsole. No redeeming qualities for that mess.
Yes the lines are different but the silhouette, midsole and overall look of the shoes are very similar.
So for you to like one and say the others is trash, you get the bigger
- Jul 18, 2012
- 34,211
- 40,121
Yes the lines are different but the silhouette, midsole and overall look of the shoes are very similar.
So for you to like one and say the others is trash, you get the bigger
Are you okay?
Lets just use this logic of yours.
Yes the lines are different but the silhouette, midsole and overall look of the shoes are very similar.
So for you to like one and say the others is trash, you get the bigger bigger
- Jan 2, 2014
- 4,855
- 7,400
Are you okay?
Lets just use this logic of yours.
Yes the lines are different but the silhouette, midsole and overall look of the shoes are very similar.
So for you to like one and say the others is trash, you get the bigger bigger
Apparently you’re not “Ok”.
- Jul 18, 2012
- 34,211
- 40,121
- Jan 2, 2014
- 4,855
- 7,400
Uhuh.
You’re good, your perception isn’t the reality and you can’t be shown any different.
You’ll be ok, now go outside and play.
- Jul 18, 2012
- 34,211
- 40,121
You’re good, your perception isn’t the reality and you can’t be shown any different.
You’ll be ok, now go outside and play.
Uhuh.
- Feb 7, 2016
- 13,286
- 10,780
they are not similar, they look different. but the 35 do shine on some colorways aesthetically. other than that, it will be forever the shoe that almost broke my foot permanently.It’s strange how you two say the 35’s a “Trash” when visually, the shoes are very similar to the 36’s.
- Feb 7, 2016
- 13,286
- 10,780
what mess?Cmon son.
The lines and thiccness of the 35 is all trash. That middle part is terrible, fatass midsole. No redeeming qualities for that mess.
Attachments
- Dec 9, 2002
- 34,665
- 28,027
Dude needs glasses
- Jan 2, 2014
- 4,855
- 7,400
You’re right, it’s a totally different design and they look nothing alike.
- Jan 2, 2014
- 4,855
- 7,400
You need eyes.
- Jan 2, 2014
- 4,855
- 7,400
Last edited:
- Aug 13, 2000
- 1,657
- 3,942
Like the 35s but...nothing like the 34/36.
If going in sequence with regards to aesthetics its 35 34 36.
35s came across as a step backwards and are chunky as hell in contrast to the more sleek feel and appearance of the 34/36. Dont ball and yet the plate on the 35s is rather uncomfortable even for basic gym workouts. Think they were trying to develope something more beefy for Zion.
If going in sequence with regards to aesthetics its 35 34 36.
35s came across as a step backwards and are chunky as hell in contrast to the more sleek feel and appearance of the 34/36. Dont ball and yet the plate on the 35s is rather uncomfortable even for basic gym workouts. Think they were trying to develope something more beefy for Zion.
- Mar 19, 2019
- 638
- 949
34s got the slight edge, but 35s definitely not trash tho
I worn the 35s with jeans and got compliments. They're the best after the 34 imo.It’s strange how you two say the 35’s a “Trash” when visually, the shoes are very similar to the 36’s.
- Jan 2, 2014
- 4,855
- 7,400
And you’ll continue to get compliments because it’s a good looking shoe.
I’ve asked three people and they all said the 36’s look like the 35’s.
But maybe all four of us need glasses or new eyes.
- Oct 8, 2013
- 2,161
- 3,043
I liked the 35 low but the mids didn't do much for me just like the 36 mid. I do think they're both very similar as well but there are subtle differences.
- Feb 7, 2016
- 13,286
- 10,780
I also got compliments wearing my DNA 35s, but not as much as the 34 SEs that people kept on asking what they are and where I got them. The biggest fail of the 35 is that horrible midplate.
- Mar 19, 2019
- 638
- 949
The 34 se was so clean. Jb/nike should've made more color ways.
- Jul 18, 2012
- 34,211
- 40,121
And you’ll continue to get compliments because it’s a good looking shoe.
I’ve asked three people and they all said the 36’s look like the 35’s.
But maybe all four of us need glasses or new eyes.
Now ask again if the 35 is a good looking shoe.
The **** you so mad for. You the head designer for the 35?
- Jan 2, 2014
- 4,855
- 7,400
Now ask again if the 35 is a good looking shoe.
The **** you so mad for. You the head designer for the 35?
You’re not good with assumptions because I’m not mad or angry. I simply said they look alike, which most humans looking at the two shoes would agree with.
So **** *** you ******* ******.
- Jul 18, 2012
- 34,211
- 40,121
You’re not good with assumptions because I’m not mad or angry. I simply said they look alike, which most humans looking at the two shoes would agree with.
So **** *** you ******* ******.
You didnt just say they look like, they look alike so they must be both good looking is what you said. Do I need to bring up the Fila 11’s again?
- Jan 2, 2014
- 4,855
- 7,400
You didnt just say they look like, they look alike so they must be both good looking is what you said. Do I need to bring up the Fila 11’s again?
You can bring up the Fila 37’s if you‘d like.
You said the 35’s are trash when the literally look like the 36’s so your opinion’s strange, that’s all.
One of us needs our eyes checked, “You” but I’ll say that mine need to be checked to end this back and fourth.
- Mar 16, 2020
- 3,442
- 6,665
Someone will always not agree with an opinion. Better fish to fry.
