megatron
Banned
- 2,896
- 24
- Joined
- Aug 31, 2011
lord of the rings is boring as hell b
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Hold up though, some movies are so bad to ppl that they literally will not subject themselves to watching it in it's entirety. I think those situations speak to how much a person felt a movie sucked more so than being close minded. Just because he says the movie sucked and that he didn't watch it in it's entirety does not mean he's close minded. You can't be seriously saying you need to watch a movie in it's entirety to tell if whether or not it sucks.Originally Posted by JPZx
Lets go over this again.Originally Posted by Iceberg Slim
No for Lord of the Rings. Those movies suck and I've never seen one of them in its entirety
1. He makes the brash statement that, "The movies suck."
2. He admits he hasn't ever seen one from start to end.
Originally Posted by JPZx
Originally Posted by Iceberg Slim
No for Lord of the Rings. Those movies suck and I've never seen one of them in its entirety
Lets go over this again.
1. He makes the brash statement that, "The movies suck."
2. He admits he hasn't ever seen one from start to end.
Why you pretending like there's a literal objective fact on if a movie sucks or not? Of course he's stating his opinion on what he thinks about the movie. There is no difference because there is no objective fact.Originally Posted by HybridSoldier23
That doesn't mean that they suck. It means you didn't like them. Very big difference.
I'm not pretending, there is. You need to look at in terms of overall filmmaking quality: direction, production value, acting, cinematography, costuming, script, quality of adaptation from source material, and score. All of these are measurable attributes that can be critically judged.Originally Posted by ATGD7154xBBxMZ
Why you pretending like there's a literal objective fact on if a movie sucks or not? Of course he's stating his opinion on what he thinks about the movie. There is no difference because there is no objective fact.Originally Posted by HybridSoldier23
That doesn't mean that they suck. It means you didn't like them. Very big difference.
For any movie you want to claim "actually sucks" there's someone out there that likes and even loves it no matter the amount of ppl who think it sucks. There's ppl who like Sucker Punch and probably saw it multiple times. Just like I don't need to watch all of Epic Movie to know that it sucks.
didnt you say in your first post that you didnt watch it? quit trollin kid.Originally Posted by megatron
lord of the rings is boring as hell b
That is not objective fact. That's creating a standard based on opinion. There is no quantitative measurement on quality. Those things you bring up can be critically judged but they do not dictate on whether or not a film sucks, it's just something made up to see if a movie passes the grade.Originally Posted by HybridSoldier23
I'm not pretending, there is. You need to look at in terms of overall filmmaking quality: direction, production value, acting, cinematography, costuming, script, quality of adaptation from source material, and score. All of these are measurable attributes that can be critically judged.Originally Posted by ATGD7154xBBxMZ
Why you pretending like there's a literal objective fact on if a movie sucks or not? Of course he's stating his opinion on what he thinks about the movie. There is no difference because there is no objective fact.Originally Posted by HybridSoldier23
That doesn't mean that they suck. It means you didn't like them. Very big difference.
For any movie you want to claim "actually sucks" there's someone out there that likes and even loves it no matter the amount of ppl who think it sucks. There's ppl who like Sucker Punch and probably saw it multiple times. Just like I don't need to watch all of Epic Movie to know that it sucks.
The movies excel in these categories. Critical reviews, film scholars, the Academy of motion picture arts and sciences, and the general public have the same consensus that the trilogy does not suck.
Just because someone doesn't like the actual film, has no interest in the material, or can't sit through it doesn't mean that they suck. It means that they did not like it.
You like the Twilight movies, but say Lord of the Rings sucks?Originally Posted by Iceberg Slim
I like the twilight movies. Dont care what anyone says
Saw this coming but I'm not even mad.Originally Posted by dadecounty11
You like the Twilight movies, but say Lord of the Rings sucks?Originally Posted by Iceberg Slim
I like the twilight movies. Dont care what anyone says........
Your opinion on this matter can no longer be taken seriously.
Originally Posted by ILL LEGAL OPERATION
Originally Posted by RetroSan
Originally Posted by ILL LEGAL OPERATION
but when he choked in the clutch but not killing the torch carrying orge i was like ""
Are you a girl by chance?Originally Posted by Iceberg Slim
Saw this coming but I'm not even mad.Originally Posted by dadecounty11
You like the Twilight movies, but say Lord of the Rings sucks?Originally Posted by Iceberg Slim
I like the twilight movies. Dont care what anyone says........
Your opinion on this matter can no longer be taken seriously.
Originally Posted by kvsm23vs24
Originally Posted by RetroSan
Originally Posted by ILL LEGAL OPERATION
but when he choked in the clutch but not killing the torch carrying orge i was like ""
Hit em with two arrows
When he killed that elephant