- 145,551
- 176,338
- Joined
- Mar 16, 2010
And? 2 of history's biggest tyrants in history may or may not have been religious,you think that was part of their main motivation?
Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Being atheist doesn't mean you more likely to be inhumane. In the same breath, being theistic doesn't mean you are more likely to be humane.
Disgusting people will do disgusting things.
Oh boy.[quote name="Mister Friendly"]Atheists seem be more humane?
I couldve sworn this guy was atheist
View media item 1665625
Hitler never got a chance to fulfill his full agenda, but the thought is he was moving towards the remove of religion
Stalin was an definitely atheist..he used the Church temporarily for his own means, that doesnt erase his years of brutal actions towards religions
I don't think you could say either man was religious in any real sense
Stalin was an atheist, there was no atheist doctrine used by him to do what he did. Dude just decided removing religion was the quickest way to achieving power. I mean religions are brutal as hell to other religions, the difference is their religions encourage them to do so.
According to a lot on the right yesChristian oppression? In America? Is that a real thing?
Just because there's no Stalin atheist doctrine, theres no denying his actions were that of an atheistStalin was an atheist, there was no atheist doctrine used by him to do what he did. Dude just decided removing religion was the quickest way to achieving power. I mean religions are brutal as hell to other religions, the difference is their religions encourage them to do so.Hitler never got a chance to fulfill his full agenda, but the thought is he was moving towards the remove of religion
Stalin was an definitely atheist..he used the Church temporarily for his own means, that doesnt erase his years of brutal actions towards religions
I don't think you could say either man was religious in any real sense
thisStalin was an atheist, there was no atheist doctrine used by him to do what he did. Dude just decided removing religion was the quickest way to achieving power. I mean religions are brutal as hell to other religions, the difference is their religions encourage them to do so.Hitler never got a chance to fulfill his full agenda, but the thought is he was moving towards the remove of religion
Stalin was an definitely atheist..he used the Church temporarily for his own means, that doesnt erase his years of brutal actions towards religions
I don't think you could say either man was religious in any real sense
That question is just like asking a Christian why the won't just kill themselves now to get to the "afterlife" already
*Damn Blaster already mentioned it
No it isn't right after iirc. You're correct,it says you're "asleep" until the "2nd coming". I should've said get closer to insteadIsIs it ever explicitly stated in the Bible of Christianity that following death a person is immediately sent to Heaven or Hell? I thought that was reserved for Judgement Day.That question is just like asking a Christian why the won't just kill themselves now to get to the "afterlife" already
*Damn Blaster already mentioned it
Friendly. What exactly are the actions of an athiest. In re the Stalin comment you made? Help me understandits mind boggling that someone needs to ask a question like "are atheists moral"
the answer is the same if you replace "atheist" with any other group of people
some are, some are not
its mind boggling that someone needs to ask a question like "are atheists moral"
the answer is the same if you replace "atheist" with any other group of people
some are, some are not
Just because there's no Stalin atheist doctrine, theres no denying his actions were that of an atheist
Yea his actions were that of an atheists, but his actions weren't necessarily BECAUSE he was an atheist. I can't say the same for Nazi Germany and all crusades and the rape of Africa at the hands of Christians. It is a judeochristian tradition to spread it's religion and culture by brutal means. This was directly sanctioned by God. jihad is directly sanctioned by God.
Either way you can have Stalin, but Christianity has a worse track record.
what are actions that are natural for an atheistIts the same difference manYea his actions were that of an atheists, but his actions weren't necessarily BECAUSE he was an atheist. I can't say the same for Nazi Germany and all crusades and the rape of Africa at the hands of Christians. It is a judeochristian tradition to spread it's religion and culture by brutal means. This was directly sanctioned by God. jihad is directly sanctioned by God.Just because there's no Stalin atheist doctrine, theres no denying his actions were that of an atheist
Either way you can have Stalin, but Christianity has a worse track record.
His actions were atheist in nature