Best president to ever lead this country?

Originally Posted by BdeaZy

Originally Posted by DangerousG

Teddy Roosevelt Abroham Lincoln, it's not even close.


*Fixed


DangerousG
grin.gif


K, bro.
 
Originally Posted by AJ27526

Anyone who says JFK is only saying so because of his unfortunate assassination. were it not for that he would be remembered for very little

You don't know that...so stop making such a claim...
laugh.gif
laugh.gif
laugh.gif



...
 
Originally Posted by AJ27526

Anyone who says JFK is only saying so because of his unfortunate assassination. were it not for that he would be remembered for very little

You don't know that...so stop making such a claim...
laugh.gif
laugh.gif
laugh.gif



...
 
Originally Posted by AJ27526

Anyone who says JFK is only saying so because of his unfortunate assassination. were it not for that he would be remembered for very little

This whole thread is based off what history wrote. 
History more than likely will just as kind to Obama as it is to JFK. 
 
Originally Posted by AJ27526

Anyone who says JFK is only saying so because of his unfortunate assassination. were it not for that he would be remembered for very little

This whole thread is based off what history wrote. 
History more than likely will just as kind to Obama as it is to JFK. 
 
Since the question is best president to LEAD should wartime presidents take precedent? In that case it would fall down to Abe or FDR (Truman?)
 
Since the question is best president to LEAD should wartime presidents take precedent? In that case it would fall down to Abe or FDR (Truman?)
 
No love for my man Washington? Dude has stories about him like dos equis most interesting man in the world
 
No love for my man Washington? Dude has stories about him like dos equis most interesting man in the world
 
Originally Posted by mikykr20

definitley not obama, the guy just got lucky, thats all

inheriting one of the worst economies in american history with a few expensive and messy wars to boot. so lucky. 
grin.gif
 
Originally Posted by Xtapolapacetl

I always find it tragicomical how the presidents who are generally regarded as the top 3 presidents in U.S. history (Washington, Lincoln & FDR) are all presidents from the three biggest wars U.S. was involved in... While some president who was in office during a time of peace wasn't "blessed" with a period of war to put him on the top of the charts.

Whether they want to admit it it or not and no matter how left wing and pacifist, they may be, historians are drawn to high body counts. The more people killed on your watch, the more pages you get, the books written about you, the more you are remembered.

Sadly, war is part of the human experience and it is better to be on the wining end instead of the losing end so Presidents who presided over victorious wars do deserve acclaim but scholars of American history as well historians of non American history should give more attention to people who actually created instead of destroyed. The poet, the doctor, the artist, the philosopher, the engineer and even the businessmen who enrichs our day to day lives deserve a greater share of the ink of the academic historian. 





  
 
Originally Posted by mikykr20

definitley not obama, the guy just got lucky, thats all

inheriting one of the worst economies in american history with a few expensive and messy wars to boot. so lucky. 
grin.gif
 
Originally Posted by Xtapolapacetl

I always find it tragicomical how the presidents who are generally regarded as the top 3 presidents in U.S. history (Washington, Lincoln & FDR) are all presidents from the three biggest wars U.S. was involved in... While some president who was in office during a time of peace wasn't "blessed" with a period of war to put him on the top of the charts.

Whether they want to admit it it or not and no matter how left wing and pacifist, they may be, historians are drawn to high body counts. The more people killed on your watch, the more pages you get, the books written about you, the more you are remembered.

Sadly, war is part of the human experience and it is better to be on the wining end instead of the losing end so Presidents who presided over victorious wars do deserve acclaim but scholars of American history as well historians of non American history should give more attention to people who actually created instead of destroyed. The poet, the doctor, the artist, the philosopher, the engineer and even the businessmen who enrichs our day to day lives deserve a greater share of the ink of the academic historian. 





  
 
Back
Top Bottom