You convienently missed the next sentence where I literally state he is docked several levels for not being able to consistently produce music over the long haul. I based the bolded commment off of one of tens of attributes that make a superstar artist (crossover appeal, ear for beats, showmanship, lyrics, hooks, durability, work ethic, ability to make radio songs, ability to put on a live show, energy, consistency, etc). Like that analogy makes no sense based on the context...I said hes all could, should, would and hypotheticals.....I didn't ever say he IS top 10 ever, so how is that crazy? He is the epitome of promising small sample size.
An apt analogy would be like saying Brandon Lloyd, on pure hands/spectacularcatching ability, is a top 10 receiver in the league....nowhere did I say on the whole he is a top 10 receiver inthe NFL . I guess its ridiculous if you take it out of context smh
