- 7,044
- 6,632
- Joined
- Nov 25, 2003
Same here, two of my favorites and I own neither. Last I owned the vi's were the og's in _th grade.
Black Infrared VI's returning in 2014. NO GM TALK!
- Thread in 'Jordan Brand' Thread starter Started by zack54attack,
- Start date
- 13,328
- 11,553
- Joined
- Jan 3, 2009
- 44,113
- 16,599
- Joined
- Apr 23, 2014
Because he too likes the OG's, you know, the ones without the "reflectors" on them.
- 175
- 101
- Joined
- Jul 5, 2014
BRUH...
- 175
- 101
- Joined
- Jul 5, 2014
Dont forget that high quality OG suede, banana-toe and deep infrared man!
Because he too likes the OG's, you know, the ones without the "reflectors" on them.
- 10,416
- 1,652
- Joined
- Nov 11, 2007
breath holes made me lol
putting aside enough for 2 at retail + extra.
I saw someone w these on idk if real or not but surely an indication.
the true infrared POP hard against the black.
- 23,107
- 15,454
- Joined
- Oct 26, 2013
If I want a Shoe with Reflective 3m there's tons
some are dope.
but on these OG or not.. I just like the AAAAALLLL black with Infrared
now they'll be shining everywhere.
Not every shoe in 2014 has to be Reflective or ReD
if it's not broken why fix it?
some are dope.
but on these OG or not.. I just like the AAAAALLLL black with Infrared
now they'll be shining everywhere.
Not every shoe in 2014 has to be Reflective or ReD
if it's not broken why fix it?
Still Buying Them Doe… Fo Sho!!!!
Last edited:
- 4,206
- 2,409
- Joined
- Aug 3, 2013
View media item 1186818
Bring em on.. I'm ready..
Bring em on.. I'm ready..
- 20,038
- 10,890
- Joined
- Feb 8, 2009
Because he too likes the OG's, you know, the ones without the "reflectors" on them.
Dont forget that high quality OG suede, banana-toe and deep infrared man!
The 2010 pairs actually have far better toe boxes than these 2014 pairs do in my opinion.
- 566
- 72
- Joined
- Nov 1, 2013
^They do but I'd still take the 3m on the "breath holes" 
w/ decent material on the '14 over the better shaped toe box and crappy material on the '10.
w/ decent material on the '14 over the better shaped toe box and crappy material on the '10.
Last edited:
- 5,853
- 1,514
- Joined
- Jan 26, 2014
u talkin bout them like they the 5lab3s, fully reflective n ****...
and they fixed the broken item bruh...og's had 3m so when they dropped in 10 it was broken
Last edited:
- 23,107
- 15,454
- Joined
- Oct 26, 2013
Another change that occurred between the 1991 original and 2000 retro was the underlay of reflective material that was placed underneath the perforations on the ankle and side panel. ?The first two photos below are of the original 1991 Black/Infrareds without and with flash respectively.
Air Jordan 6 Black/Infrared - 1991 Original
Air Jordan 6 Black/Infrared - 1991 Original (photographed with flash)
Air Jordan 6 Black/Infrared - 2000 Retro
These Ones ^^^^^^ are what i'm talking about… I never had the 91's … the 2000's Were my 1st 6'
Air Jordan 6 Black/Infrared - 2010 Retro
Last edited:
- 20,038
- 10,890
- Joined
- Feb 8, 2009
^They do but I'd still take the 3m on the "breath holes"
I can't say the 3M is a make or break feature for me, but the fact that they're not suede (which indeed does automatically makes them better than the 2010
) and I really miss the 2000 pair I had until recently makes these a go.
- 2,634
- 626
- Joined
- Aug 7, 2011
Fedex man just dropped these off.
View media item 1187323
(click to enlarge)
View media item 1187318View media item 1187320View media item 1187321View media item 1187322View media item 1187315View media item 1187316.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
View media item 650509
I'm eating.
View media item 1187323
(click to enlarge)
View media item 1187318View media item 1187320View media item 1187321View media item 1187322View media item 1187315View media item 1187316.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
View media item 650509
I'm eating.
Last edited:
ELTORO84
formerly air23xxi
- 1,770
- 684
- Joined
- May 24, 2006
Those are nice. My size too.
Last edited:
- 23,107
- 15,454
- Joined
- Oct 26, 2013
- 2,248
- 611
- Joined
- Aug 20, 2014
Curious but the production dates are less than a month apart... does that count as a flag it count be counterfeit? Sorry for the newbie question but just learning as I go. I was under the impression prod dates are usually over a month apart and anything less can be considered fake.
- 8,074
- 9,243
- Joined
- Jul 20, 2013
- 305
- 46
- Joined
- May 20, 2013
So homie u a part of teamearly?
- 2,248
- 611
- Joined
- Aug 20, 2014
Is what I'm saying incorrect?
Uh oh...
- 23,107
- 15,454
- Joined
- Oct 26, 2013
- 8,074
- 9,243
- Joined
- Jul 20, 2013
I agree with you & have made my opinion known on what I think about early pairs obtained months in advance...
Last edited:
- 305
- 46
- Joined
- May 20, 2013
Questions, questions?
- 20,038
- 10,890
- Joined
- Feb 8, 2009
Thing is, he didn't come through trying to claim them as anything. Just let him rock and enjoy the pictures.
- 305
- 46
- Joined
- May 20, 2013
How can anyone enjoy something that might be fagazzi......we talkin on a website about authentics and dude cops early and we all know where most of the teamearlies come from.
All we did was point some things out, and ask a couple questions.
All we did was point some things out, and ask a couple questions.
Similar threads
