Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Nowitness41Dirk wrote:
Hughes only got crushed in one start? Maybe we have different definitions of what 2 quality starts and an ERA north of 5.00 through 7 starts is...![]()
The fact he went 5 or fewer innings in all but 2 of his starts tells me all I need to know...
Only delusional Yankee fans believe he's got the type value that headlines this type of deal right now, especially when it involves trades within the division...
Please point me to where I said he would headline a deal? I love the term "delusional Yankee fan" like thinking a 23 year old with greatstuff might turn out to be pretty good is delusional.
Which starts besides Baltimore did he get crushed in? How well and deep should a 23 year old be going in games? Yeah he definitely doesn't have the samevalue as 07 I know that but to say he's not someone Toronto would be interested in for Halladay is ridiculous.
Originally Posted by Osh Kosh Bosh
I hear kind of mixed opinons on Montero, some say he is a bad catcher and others say he might be able to stick there. If all else fails he could be adequate at first, but that bat absolutly plays anywhere and cant be ignored. He's also only 19 so he can still develop into something defensivly.Originally Posted by John Sterling
Nowitness41Dirk wrote:
Montero has no position. He's great with the bat, but he's supposedly terrible everywhere defensively.. What's the real value of a DH prospect through trade?Originally Posted by John Sterling
A 19 year old hitting .336/.391/.556 isnt elite? I guess that means Smoak isnt elite since those numbers are basically similar. Please...
So a 19 year old top 5 hitting prospect, a 23 year old pitcher that's finally healthy pitching well in the AL East and a 21 year old centerfielder at .317/.385/.557 is no good?![]()
Like I said they probably cant make the best offer (unless Joba or Cano are involved, which would make it close) but Halladay has to aprove the trade which means he would want compensation and what team has the resources for that?.. Smoak is every bit the hitter, and he's a potential gold glove first baseman... So, yeah...![]()
Phil Hughes' value is in the dumps right now, regardless what you want to believe... Until he can prove to be healthy and effective as a starter, he ain't a headliner in a trade like this... He got CRUSHED in all but one start this year before moving to the pen...
And Austin Jackson has more than his share of doubters...
It's an OK offer, but like I said, there are probably AT LEAST 4 or 5 teams that can make better ones...
And Hughes got CRUSHED in one start this year, not all of them. He's been healthy this year and its evident by the fact that his fastball was 94 in his starts unlike the 90 and 89 he was hiting last year.
In your opinion does Hughes or Buchholz have more value right now?
Like I said I know the Yankees cant make the best offer but add there finacial capabilities into it considering Halladay will command an extension about what Santana and Sabathia got then you have to eliminate many of the teams that have the prospects to make the deal.
In the end I believe he goes to the Phillies.
Precisely.Originally Posted by Proshares
Brown, Carrasco, Happ, Donald and Marson might not be the top end prospects they're looking for...good prospects but not eye opening great ones.
Originally Posted by Osh Kosh Bosh
Precisely.Originally Posted by Proshares
Brown, Carrasco, Happ, Donald and Marson might not be the top end prospects they're looking for...good prospects but not eye opening great ones.![]()
Hanson, Heyword, and 2 other guys would be a done deal instantly.Originally Posted by Proshares
OKB,
Just to gauge what it would take to land him...say if the Braves offered Hanson, Heyward and another prospect or if Florida offered Maybin, Stanton and Morrison would those offers be anywhere close to enough? Or would they need more?
I doubt they would offer Lester and I don't wan't anything to do with Ellsburrys wackness, but yeah if the Red Sox are serious thats theway they start.Originally Posted by Proshares
Boston can offer a lot...Clay, Anderson, Bowden, Bard hell even Ellsbury and Lester if they wanted Halladay that bad.
I agree. I don't see Halladay getting traded. I'm sure teams will try but I would be really surprised if a Halladay trade actuallyhappens.Originally Posted by Osh Kosh Bosh
I doubt they would offer Lester and I don't wan't anything to do with Ellsburrys wackness, but yeah if the Red Sox are serious thats the way they start.Originally Posted by Proshares
Boston can offer a lot...Clay, Anderson, Bowden, Bard hell even Ellsbury and Lester if they wanted Halladay that bad.
Bottom line I don't think he will be traded, I think he is back here next year and even then I'm not sure he gets traded, the only way the Blue Jays can stomach the publicity gut punch of trading Roy Hallday is if they RAPE the other teams farm system, that's something most teams won't let happen.
i believe clay has higher value than hughes in the eyes of most GMs around the league. not saying that's right or wrong or anything, but GMsaround baseball love buchholz. from there on, bowden and bard are two i actually wouldn't even want to give up for doc, lars i don't know much aboutyet. bowden and bard have a lot of promise tho. i don't see the sox putting a package together that includes more than any two of the above mentioned guys.Originally Posted by John Sterling
Maybe its me being a homer or what not I just dont see how Clay, Lars, Bowden and Bard are better than Hughes, Jesus, Mcallister and Jackson.
Yep, because fans should be complacent and not expect their team to ALWAYS look to improve and get better.Originally Posted by MFr3shM
Damn Yankee fans wanting it all. Y You just got CC and AJ two Aces (even though they aren't pitching great) and now you want another Ace in Roy Halladay you guys are so greedy its sickening.
Originally Posted by briannnnn
Brackman still has a LOT to prove to me (and others) since he hasn't thrown a lot because of injuries.
Originally Posted by Proshares
Brown, Carrasco, Happ, Donald and Marson might not be the top end prospects they're looking for...good prospects but not eye opening great ones.
I just cant see an argument as to why Clay has more value than Hughes. Smiliar value? Yea definetly but not higher. Bard scares me because I hatehard throwing relievers. Bowden I think is more of the Ian Kennedy style where he doesnt have the great stuff but can get hitters out. Thats might nottranslate to the majors.Originally Posted by DeadsetAce
i believe clay has higher value than hughes in the eyes of most GMs around the league. not saying that's right or wrong or anything, but GMs around baseball love buchholz. from there on, bowden and bard are two i actually wouldn't even want to give up for doc, lars i don't know much about yet. bowden and bard have a lot of promise tho. i don't see the sox putting a package together that includes more than any two of the above mentioned guys.Originally Posted by John Sterling
Maybe its me being a homer or what not I just dont see how Clay, Lars, Bowden and Bard are better than Hughes, Jesus, Mcallister and Jackson.