- 6,720
- 76
Speech was pretty heart-felt. Congrats to D Rose.
Breaking News: Derrick Rose named 2010-2011 MVP
- Thread in 'Sports & Training' Thread starter Started by zack54attack,
- Start date
- 6,720
- 76
Speech was pretty heart-felt. Congrats to D Rose.
- 5,983
- 533
Definitely deserves it. The acceptance speech was great!
- 5,983
- 533
Definitely deserves it. The acceptance speech was great!
- 1,859
- 14
too big + too strong + too fast = D-Rose is too good, lol
- 1,859
- 14
too big + too strong + too fast = D-Rose is too good, lol
- 794
- 10
The points per 100 possessions stat is the one that gets me.
Bulls are only 1.49 points per 100 possessions better with Rose on the court than with him off.
That is absolutely
for an MVP.
Bulls are only 1.49 points per 100 possessions better with Rose on the court than with him off.
That is absolutely
- 794
- 10
The points per 100 possessions stat is the one that gets me.
Bulls are only 1.49 points per 100 possessions better with Rose on the court than with him off.
That is absolutely
for an MVP.
Bulls are only 1.49 points per 100 possessions better with Rose on the court than with him off.
That is absolutely
- 8,131
- 618
Man yall can stuff those stats you know where
Rose is your NBA MVP this year dammit!
Rose is your NBA MVP this year dammit!
- 8,131
- 618
Man yall can stuff those stats you know where
Rose is your NBA MVP this year dammit!
Rose is your NBA MVP this year dammit!
- 1,026
- 167
Originally Posted by MzD650
The points per 100 possessions stat is the one that gets me.
Bulls are only 1.49 points per 100 possessions better with Rose on the court than with him off.
That is absolutelyfor an MVP.
Fool there bench d was better than the starting d ....of course its gonna be better...
- 1,026
- 167
Originally Posted by MzD650
The points per 100 possessions stat is the one that gets me.
Bulls are only 1.49 points per 100 possessions better with Rose on the court than with him off.
That is absolutelyfor an MVP.
Fool there bench d was better than the starting d ....of course its gonna be better...
- 3,076
- 445
New age stats nerds got me lol over. What the world are you talking about?
- 3,076
- 445
New age stats nerds got me lol over. What the world are you talking about?
- 354
- 11
next up.. MVP of the championship
- 354
- 11
next up.. MVP of the championship
Bend_The_Knee
formerly gotholesinmysocks
- 61,802
- 23,543
Bend_The_Knee
formerly gotholesinmysocks
- 61,802
- 23,543
- 9,018
- 5,582
- 9,018
- 5,582
- 794
- 10
Originally Posted by assyrianplaya
Originally Posted by MzD650
The points per 100 possessions stat is the one that gets me.
Bulls are only 1.49 points per 100 possessions better with Rose on the court than with him off.
That is absolutelyfor an MVP.
Fool there bench d was better than the starting d ....of course its gonna be better...
Not sure how that helps your argument bro.
Nor am I sure why the need for insults.
- 794
- 10
Originally Posted by assyrianplaya
Originally Posted by MzD650
The points per 100 possessions stat is the one that gets me.
Bulls are only 1.49 points per 100 possessions better with Rose on the court than with him off.
That is absolutelyfor an MVP.
Fool there bench d was better than the starting d ....of course its gonna be better...
Not sure how that helps your argument bro.
Nor am I sure why the need for insults.
- 1,811
- 240
It's still way too early with NBA stats to see which of the new age ones make sense. It's just the baseball geeks trying to validate their over analyzation of a sport. I think I just made a new word.
- 1,811
- 240
It's still way too early with NBA stats to see which of the new age ones make sense. It's just the baseball geeks trying to validate their over analyzation of a sport. I think I just made a new word.
- 2,950
- 10
No you didn't. It's a nominalization of analyze. You also could have been a normal person and used over-analysis.
So "baseball geeks" are the ones that use advanced stats? So in baseball are Theo and Billy "baseball geeks"?
