Dallas police woman breaks into home of young man and shoots him to death Update: GUILTY of murder

i really dislike when folks start inputting god in these situations
specially when the same god they referring to
is the same one
the white folks forced upon u
and used as justification to enslave
as well as to "tame" my fellow black folks
 
vegetaray123 said:
Just trying to deflect from the facts...Same thing with that Mariachi Band line too...

On a side note the fact that the judge allowed the castle doctrine to be a usable defense, so that it couldn’t be used in a future appeal is fantastic...
Click to expand...

Based on what standard of review the court will utilize to review her appeal, this may or may not have an effect. They'll argue for a completely de novo review, which they won't get. From the lowest to the highest standard of review, jury instructions and matters of law decided by a judge are rarely called into question or overturned and are shown deference the majority of the time, unless they are clearly erroneous. All this to say, whether she allowed it or not, it wouldn't have much if not any affect on her appeal.
 
ears1351 said:
Based on what standard of review the court will utilize to review her appeal, this may or may not have an effect. They'll argue for a completely de novo review, which they won't get. From the lowest to the highest standard of review, jury instructions and matters of law decided by a judge are rarely called into question or overturned and are shown deference the majority of the time, unless they are clearly erroneous. All this to say, whether she allowed it or not, it wouldn't have much if not any affect on her appeal.
Click to expand...

I miss-typed there...I meant that the judge allowed the jury to weigh that as an option...Your obviously more well versed in this stuff than I am, but if the jury has that as an option does that mean she can’t come back on a future appeal with the castle doctrine as the basis for her defense? Since the jury weighed in their deliberations that is?
 
She has trauma from rape, but chose probably a top 3 most dangerous job?? I’m sure she knew being a cop, means clear and present danger.

I bet her mental checked out fine, at the policy academy. Now all of the sudden, she had underlying trauma? Child please.
 
vegetaray123 said:
I miss-typed there...I meant that the judge allowed the jury to weigh that as an option...Your obviously more well versed in this stuff than I am, but if the jury has that as an option does that mean she can’t come back on a future appeal with the castle doctrine as the basis for her defense? Since the jury weighed in their deliberations that is?
Click to expand...
No worries on the typo; and I clerked for an appeals judge, so I know a little bit! Regarding your question, unless there's an issue that is fundamental to the case that caused an erroneous outcome, the facts, strategy nor pleadings are taken into account in an appeal. So for her appeal to be granted, her attorneys will have to write an appellate brief (this is what's reviewed before they even think about hearing oral arguments or anything further) that outlines and convinces the appellate judge that the lower court that issued decision made an error that was fundamental to the outcome of the case ; and this error can't be an issue of fact (whether or not they agree with evidence presented), strategy (what objections were made, not made, defenses presented or not presented). So basically, her attorney's choice of defense wouldn't even come into question unless she was granted an appeal de novo, which definitely isn't going to happen.
 
Every black / brown person around the world.. waiting for jury to drop the book...
giphy (2) (1).gif
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

B
Black woman calls cops only to be killed by cops.
Replies
11
Views
2K
1995
1995

Thread Gallery

View Full Gallery

The ultimate sneaker enthusiast community.

NikeTalk was created as a way of giving back to both the sneaker enthusiast community and to the greater global community of which we are all a part.

NikeTalk is NOT affiliated with Nike Inc. in any way, shape, or form. All opinions expressed herein do not necessarily reflect those of Nike, Inc.

© 1999-2024 NikeTalk.com

Share this page

Back
Top Bottom