- Aug 2, 2006
- 34,498
- 29,963
Watch "Trans Woman Talks about Dave Chappelle Trans Controversy" on YouTube
wow so you're telling me trans people are not a monolith and have varied and nuanced views on this subject?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Watch "Trans Woman Talks about Dave Chappelle Trans Controversy" on YouTube
Who claimed they were a monolith?wow so you're telling me trans people are not a monolith and have varied and nuanced views on this subject?
Who claimed they were a monolith?
So make another negative assumption about random people on the internet that upset youfrom what I observed when this original argument broke out would wield the opinion of
*insert trans activist* to support their claims.
imo the inherit assumption in that style of argument
is that there is a settled authoritative trans opinion on Dave Chappelle, speech, harm and the societal impact of offensive comedy
So make another negative assumption about random people on the internet that upset you?
Aight man
Then you are guilty of doing that every time to make a take about black people, Canadians, Nigerians, etc.if the question is what is the is Dave Chappelle's comedy harmful to society?
and the response well xyz trans person say it's harmful.
the obvious implication is that xyz trans person represents broader trans opinion.
if by making another negative assumption you mean = reading english
than yes that's what I'm doing.
Then you are guilty of doing that every time to make a take about black people, Canadians, Nigerians, etc.
Because you don't always put a disclaimer on it that "I don't speak for all insert group' " .
Tons of people do it this in discussions and arguments. There is a natural implication that someone is not claiming to speak for each and every person of said group. Just describe an opinion that is prevalent/popular among a group.
So spare me with the "reading English" **** Osh. This is just you taking issue with the slightest of things
Again
Last time he talked to them he lost his cool because the students were criticizing him.Lol the smoke
Dave would destroy these "I've learned everything about the world locked in my house for the past two years" woke students
Dave has lived these kids lives three times over
Last time he talked to them he lost his cool because the students were criticizing him.
He said in his speech that the reason he didn't put his name on the building was that he didn't want his name being up there being a reason kids feel bad
He also complain that the kids were somehow being duped.
You can do you usual schtick of whining about "woke" people, but just looking at Dave's own actions and words it is kinda obvious he doesn't like the fact some of the students are angry at him.
Dude could have just done it and not say shh
This thing with those students happened almost 7 months ago at this point
I wouldn't like it either if morons were associating me with drafting anti trans laws, advocating for unequal treatment of trans...killing trans people in Brazil... Etc etc
When the people who do all those things you listed above use Dave's words to justify their right to restrict trans people's lives, the responsible thing is to reevaluate what he's putting out there.Dave isn't tied to any of that
Dave's words;When the people who do all those things you listed above use Dave's words to justify their right to restrict trans people's lives, the responsible thing is to reevaluate what he's putting out there.
If one day people start claiming without evidence, that your art is leading directly to the murder /genocide of a vulnerable populationWhat a stupid thing to drag this long, especially when you don't really have a personal stake beyond "I do what I want" like a petulant child. Ego is a mother****er.