- 28,644
- 11,875
- Joined
- Oct 31, 2009
I think we give these critics too much credit, I'll be seeing the movie myself before deeming it trash
DC Studios THREAD - GunnVerse Begins - Chapter ONE: Gods & Monsters
- 11,411
- 5,368
- Joined
- Aug 17, 2007
Lost is legit one the worst things to happen to TV
- 2,729
- 2,369
- Joined
- Jul 19, 2012
Agreed.
I also think it's lame most of the negative reviews have made heavy comparisons to the MCU films as a reason to discredit the film. How is that even professional? Cats comparing the first two movies to Marvel films made 8 years after the universe started.
- 149,015
- 197,621
- Joined
- Mar 30, 2007
Fans all up in their feels trying to shut down RT
And "marvel fanboy" gets throw around regularly
I don't even go on rotten tomatoes.. Only been on the site a handful of times in my life
I use IMDb (or google) when I want to find out the info I want to know about movies
- 149,015
- 197,621
- Joined
- Mar 30, 2007
I don't
- 10,911
- 9,203
- Joined
- Apr 27, 2014
Dudes really in this thread fighting the good fight.
SS was before the Geoff Johns/WB shakeup by the way.
SS was before the Geoff Johns/WB shakeup by the way.
- 2,571
- 1,538
- Joined
- Jul 3, 2014
Why's that?
- 68,851
- 104,707
- Joined
- Apr 30, 2010
It's quite literally one of the best things to happen due to the door it opened for all the creativity that followed on TV. What was your issue with it?
- 16,275
- 20,901
- Joined
- Aug 25, 2012
Schnepp liked it?! I was awaiting another BvS piss storm from the guyCampea said he had fun with the movie too. Dennis Zen too, so most Collider people seem to have enjoyed it.
Last edited:
- 28,303
- 53,416
- Joined
- Apr 2, 2007
So what's the verdict NY, y'all haven't let me down on movies rating...
Any ?/8....?
Any ?/8....?
- 14,106
- 6,328
- Joined
- Aug 23, 2004
So my understanding is... Critics that loved BvS hated it but Critics that hated BvS loved it? That is interesting.
- 11,411
- 5,368
- Joined
- Aug 17, 2007
Yes and Donald trump is the republican nominee **** is crazy son.
Seriously though this is weird, you got all the internet guys loving this movie, and critics calling this worse than Fantasic Four something just ain't right about this
- 16,275
- 20,901
- Joined
- Aug 25, 2012
This **** really feels like dejavu with BvS all over again lol
- 39,327
- 19,753
- Joined
- Dec 3, 2009
Last edited:
- 53,351
- 20,927
- Joined
- Nov 24, 2009
So why won't dc pay critics for good reviews?
- 39,327
- 19,753
- Joined
- Dec 3, 2009
Morals.
- 89,672
- 120,812
- Joined
- Sep 5, 2010
Sounds like another C+ DC movie.
Last edited:
- 68,851
- 104,707
- Joined
- Apr 30, 2010
The murdering Batman and Batman could get raped people?
- 6,198
- 7,144
- Joined
- Sep 3, 2014
Da faq is going on?? Grace hated it and Schnepp liked it.........
Still hyped about seeing it this weekend. Cant wait!!
- 10,911
- 9,203
- Joined
- Apr 27, 2014
Maybe this tells us that people have to form their own opinions about movies
- 57,627
- 61,185
- Joined
- Aug 6, 2012
[h1]Report: Suicide Squad Suffered From Studio Interference[/h1]
Suicide Squad arrives in theaters this week, but Warner Bros.’ latest summer tentpole has already suffered from a lashing by critics. This came as a huge surprise for a lot of fans who had been eagerly anticipating the film, which has had notably great trailers and a strong marketing campaign.
A common criticism among all of the reviews – good and bad – is that the film doesn’t flow well and is a bit of a mess, which seems to be a result of some choppy editing. There was some disquiet earlier this year when it was reported that Suicide Squad was going into extensive reshoots,which some said was a response to the poor reception of Batman V Supernan: Dawn of Justice. Sadly, a new report suggests that the talk of studio meddling was not exaggerated.
Citing multiple sources close to the production, THR reports that Warner Bros. brought in multiple editors (uncredited in the final version of the film) to piece together a “lighter, studio-favored version” that was shown to test audiences alongside director David Ayer’s “more somber version.” It isn’t uncommon to show different versions of movies to test audiences, and THR’s sources say that Ayer “agreed to and participated in the process.” In the wake of the first test screenings (in which “the studio-favored version with more characters introduced early in the film and jazzed-up graphics won”), Warner Bros.decided to invest millions of dollars in additional photography to try and find the right tone for the movie.
According to some sources, the struggle to find the right tone for Suicide Squad involved “a lot of panic and ego instead of calmly addressing the tonal issue,” and Ayer became very stressed by the process – not helped by the fact that Warner Bros. decided to pass on his follow-up film, Bright, two weeks before test screening. One source said that Ayer was under “a lot — a lot — of pressure” from the studio, and during reshoots and post-production was “exhausted and needed time to process conflicting ideas.”
One source said that the main credited editor for Suicide Squad, John Gilroy (Nightcrawler), had actually left by the end of the editing process, and that the final editor was Michael Tronick (The Green Hornet).
The report is uncomfortably reminiscent of 2015 superhero movie debacle Fantastic Four, whose production was rumored to be a battlefield between director Josh Trank and studio 20th Century Fox, with Trank reportedly shut out of the editing process entirely. There’s no guarantee, of course, thatSuicide Squad would have turned out better if Ayer had been allowed to pursue his original vision. But if Warner Bros.’ goal was to make sure that the movie was a runaway hit, the studio isn’t off to a good start.
http://screenrant.com/suicide-squad-studio-interference-warner-bros/
Suicide Squad arrives in theaters this week, but Warner Bros.’ latest summer tentpole has already suffered from a lashing by critics. This came as a huge surprise for a lot of fans who had been eagerly anticipating the film, which has had notably great trailers and a strong marketing campaign.
A common criticism among all of the reviews – good and bad – is that the film doesn’t flow well and is a bit of a mess, which seems to be a result of some choppy editing. There was some disquiet earlier this year when it was reported that Suicide Squad was going into extensive reshoots,which some said was a response to the poor reception of Batman V Supernan: Dawn of Justice. Sadly, a new report suggests that the talk of studio meddling was not exaggerated.
Citing multiple sources close to the production, THR reports that Warner Bros. brought in multiple editors (uncredited in the final version of the film) to piece together a “lighter, studio-favored version” that was shown to test audiences alongside director David Ayer’s “more somber version.” It isn’t uncommon to show different versions of movies to test audiences, and THR’s sources say that Ayer “agreed to and participated in the process.” In the wake of the first test screenings (in which “the studio-favored version with more characters introduced early in the film and jazzed-up graphics won”), Warner Bros.decided to invest millions of dollars in additional photography to try and find the right tone for the movie.
According to some sources, the struggle to find the right tone for Suicide Squad involved “a lot of panic and ego instead of calmly addressing the tonal issue,” and Ayer became very stressed by the process – not helped by the fact that Warner Bros. decided to pass on his follow-up film, Bright, two weeks before test screening. One source said that Ayer was under “a lot — a lot — of pressure” from the studio, and during reshoots and post-production was “exhausted and needed time to process conflicting ideas.”
One source said that the main credited editor for Suicide Squad, John Gilroy (Nightcrawler), had actually left by the end of the editing process, and that the final editor was Michael Tronick (The Green Hornet).
The report is uncomfortably reminiscent of 2015 superhero movie debacle Fantastic Four, whose production was rumored to be a battlefield between director Josh Trank and studio 20th Century Fox, with Trank reportedly shut out of the editing process entirely. There’s no guarantee, of course, thatSuicide Squad would have turned out better if Ayer had been allowed to pursue his original vision. But if Warner Bros.’ goal was to make sure that the movie was a runaway hit, the studio isn’t off to a good start.
http://screenrant.com/suicide-squad-studio-interference-warner-bros/
Last edited:
- 16,543
- 7,757
- Joined
- Nov 17, 2013
It's like WB wants to take the L.
They like losing out on potential $$$?
They like losing out on potential $$$?
- 10,911
- 9,203
- Joined
- Apr 27, 2014
Sounds a whole lot like F4 if it's actually true
But I really hate these movie runor articles. Never any citations it's always "some sources" or "sources close to the production".
Last edited:
- 26,653
- 39,397
- Joined
- Jan 30, 2007
Can't wait for them to release the Extended Cut in a few months!
- 149,015
- 197,621
- Joined
- Mar 30, 2007
david fincher/alien 3 is the most disappointing studio interference story, to me..
that director, with that material should have been greatness
that director, with that material should have been greatness
Last edited:
