- 5,955
- 6,972
- Joined
- Jul 3, 2015
Lmao I thought this thread was way back I went to like page 6 , thought this was the marvel thread lmao
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Thread went out of its mind in the short time I was awayWait this ISNT a Marvel thread?
All Reeves got to his name are those ape movies. When has he been beyond reproach? Or just automatically trusted with any movie franchise he helms?Another thing; I thought we trusted Matt Reeves as a director? The man hasn't come out with any trash to date.
The Eisenberg comparisons don't work. That's an instance of a questionable and controversial director (Snyder) casting an unusual choice for an iconic character. One sees the angle they were going for with Lex (evil genius silicon valley exec instead of traditional evil genius exec) but the physical appearance and demeanor of the actor didn't fit the nature of the character. It's generally accepted that Eisenberg was a misfire for that and for writing reasons.
Nolan and Reeves aren't questionable or controversial directors, even if you aren't the biggest fan of the DK trilogy.
Let's look at it quantitatively and objectively:
A director known for his polarizing films that are all over the place critically (Snyder) casts an unusual choice for an iconic character (Eisenberg). The actor's physical appearance and mannerisms don't match the character are all.
A director known for his work on quality films (Nolan, Reeves) casts an unusual choice for an iconic character (Ledger, Pattinson). The actor is not known to be a bad or untalented actor. The physical profile and demeanor of the actor are not inconsistent with that of the character (Rob is taller than Bale and Keaton. We presume he will build muscle as Bale did. With Joker it's literally a matter of makeup and hair dye).
And this is in no way comparing Ledger and Pattison's abilities so nobody hit me with that.
Yeah but there are plenty of actors that sre in better standing than Pattinson.And what would’ve of been the best choice to play Batman? No matter who was pick to play Batman it was never going to make everyone happy.
And that's really only cuz Nolan didnt cover the full scope of Ra's Al Ghul.It will be nice if we can finally get a Batman that doesn’t become overshadowed by his rogues gallery. Batman Begins was as close as we have gotten imo.
Yeah I remember that and it didnt sound that different from the script when Battffleck was involved where the movie sounded like Batman taking on a bunch of his rogue's gallery with cameos by other villains. But the tweet singles out Penguin and Catwoman. We just saw Nolanversiom of Catwoman.reeves wanted a lot involved iirc, a la comic books so we might see more especially if its going to be detective-centric
articles does specifically say "includes catwoman and penguin"
Not trueThe biggest thing with this casting is that this pretty much confirms that they’re going a new route with Superman. Cavill is outta there.